Politics Abhors a Vacuum
Posted by Bob on July 5, 2008 at 9:28 pm
Filed Under General | Leave a Comment
The Perot phenomenon demonstrated this rule.
It is hard for us today to look at history and understand why no one saw the French and Russian Revolutions coming. I compared the March on Rome to Perot.
Every revolution is preceded by a wide, gaping hole in the political landscape which anybody should have seen but nobody does. Every time there are several elephants stamping around in the living room.
Today, as I also pointed out, you can see the hole because everybody who gets paid for talking agrees it isn’t there.
What is frustrating to me is that everybody sees this in retrospect, but they have the same attitude that existed before every major turning-point in history. So while others whine about our being excluded from the dialogue, the fact that we are so desperately excluded is the same as if the establishment said: “These people are the future.”
For years I have been pointing out that the traitors whites are not going to have anywhere to GO. Now Obama just knocked off Hillary and Bill has nowhere to go.
Instead of seeing where I am going, people whine about a black president and insist on being astonished. Please read back over what I have been predicting. Are we going to keep yelling to each other about our helpless tatted and how bad they are until somebody else comes along and fills the political hole?
---------Shari
Posted by Bob on July 5, 2008 at 9:00 pm
Filed Under General | Leave a Comment
The reason that white men tolerated mommy professor telling them that they were the oppressors of the whole world, including their own women, was world wars I and II. All that senseless slaughter, took the heart out of them. Those who should have lead, gave over to those who had no business leading. The disgusting part, was that many just pretended.
You ask if we will win. That’s in the realm of faith, but I think that white men are absolutely bound to take over again and white women will stop being foolish and get behind them. I’m sure there will be a ton of tears between now and then as the cost of throwing away, what’s most valuable, becomes more and more apparant. I think that a lesson will have been learned that will not be easily or quickly forgotten.
– Shari
---------2008: Some Historical Background
Posted by Bob on July 5, 2008 at 9:38 am
Filed Under General | Leave a Comment
This is the first presidential election since 1960 in which neither an incumbent president or vice president is running. The last time the Democrats elected a president from outside the Old Confederacy was also 1960. And that is the one election in which all political experts agree Democrats could not have won is they had not Lyndon Johnson of Texas to concentrate on the South.
In 1988 even National Review agreed that Dukakis was hopelessly ahead of Bush, Sr. in the polls. Through all the noise, I predicted Bush would win. I had already seen the Democrats slide in election after election between their high at the convention and defeat in November, always with another Northern liberal.
Please don’t tell ME, of all people, that nothing is inevitable in politics. But it is critical both in politics and the stock market to pay attention to the basics in the midst of all the noise and Latest News.
I am just reminding you of some political history.
---------The Great Strategy I Didn’t Know I Had
Posted by Bob on July 5, 2008 at 9:18 am
Filed Under General | 2 Comments
Thinking about Helms got me to thinking about my Capitol Hill days.
One day, when the staff team was getting ready to do something, one of the team said, “We’ll have Bob do that. Bob can get ANYTHING out of the secretaries.”
I had been on the Hill for years, and I honestly didn’t know I had that reputation.
I treated the “secretaries” as colleagues. The very fact the guy referred to the lady in question as a “secretary” explained the reason he could not understand why I seemed to have this Great Strategy I was not aware of.
Congressmen and Senators almost all had a male Big Wampus called the Administrative Assistant, the guy who ran the office staff and was so often In With the Boss. Each congressman and senator normally had a woman who held the Key to the Kingdom, the one the AA CALLED when HE wanted to See the Boss.
She was NOT a secretary. To the male staff, 1) the female receptionist who had just gotten out of college, the female case workers, a title which took some time and experience, not to mention not getting fired in the meantime, to obtain, and the office manager who sat with a typewriter and decided who saw the Boss, were all “secretaries.”
This combined rudeness and ignorance with stupidity, and that was a sore point with me. I had had quite enough of this combination in decades of dealing with moderate Republicans.
What always got me about Republican moderates was not only that they kept selling us out, which one expects in hardball politics, but that they were STUPID about it. It’s like the saying about Nixon, what bothered a pro was not that he was tricky — he got the PRESIDENCY that way — but that he got CAUGHT at it.
Moderate Republicans kept saying they sold out because it was PRACTICAL, but it WASN’T even PRACTICAL! As long as moderates ruled the Party, it was a minority. EVERY TIME they got hard-core they WON! Then they went back to Jerry Ford’s mantra “The votes are in the middle of the road.”
I kept pointing out that not only did Republicans win when they went hardcore, but a list of congressmen IN CONGRESS would show that the congressional voting records showed that people who GOT elected and STAYED elected were on the right or the left, NOT IN THE CENTER.
They would then repeat the Jerry Ford maxim: “The votes are in the middle of the road.”
I got paid to be very practical about politics. I also had very strong principles. When people violated principle to do something stupid it was a double whammy to me.
Now back to my Machiavellian genius with “the secretaries.” It would never have occurred to me to call the office manager a secretary. It was one 1) a screaming declaration of ignorance, 2) bad manners – it takes YEARS to go from receptionist through case worker to Office Manager and very few make it. And 3) it was STUPID.
My principles are courtesy and respect, but it never occurred to me this was Bob’s Genius at Work. You are talking about the woman into whose hand the Boss has handed the Keys to His Kingdom. If you don’t deal with her as such, you might as well go and throw some coffee into the face of the Big Boss himself.
Please understand I am making two simultaneous points here. First, I am a gentleman and a TEAM WORKER on principle. I was as courteous with the receptionist as with the office manager.
This was not a reaction to feminism. I would have done this is in my teens.
It never occurred to me that any sane man on the Hill didn’t have the same “strategy.”
Until the guy said I had “strategy with the ‘secretaries,’’’ I was genuinely unaware of it. I thought any sane man on Capitol Hill would do what I did.
Yes, the office managers liked me better. Does this surprise anybody?
Again, what really ticked me off about this, though I didn’t make much comment on it at the time, was that this lack of principle – the principle of courtesy among others – was STUPID, and my reaction to it was the same double whammy I had about Moderate Republicanism. Combining stupidity with lack of principle was already a thorn in my side, so my reaction was the same.
What I should have thought of, according to Goodthink, was how offended these women were by this male staff insensitivity. Instead I thought about my OWN sore point, “Oh, my God! Not only are they rude and ignorant, it is STUPID to be rude and ignorant in this case!”
I had had enough of that. That, not Politically Correct sensitivity, was what froze MY gizzard.
If you wish, I’ll tell you later what I DID about it. Right now I am just hammering on how far people go out of their way to be STUPID, which was one of MY pet peeves.
---------Jesse Helms
Posted by Bob on July 5, 2008 at 8:02 am
Filed Under General | 2 Comments
Brian was kind enough to offer me condolences on the death of Jesse Helms. It is another case where Brian shows a remarkable understanding of me personally.
I knew Strom much better personally, of course, but I worked with Helms’ office. When we stopped racial quotas imposed on private schools with the Ashbrook-Dornan Amendments, which I initiated alone and we stopped with a 4-1 majority on the House Floor, Helms took over on the Senate side. Many times I would find that Helms had reprinted speeches I had written for AshBROOK and proposals I had initiated for AshBROOK.
In the late 1970s East was elected as Helms’ junior Senator from North Carolina. East was openly and proudly a Helms man. Right after the election, the lead man for moving East onto Capitol Hill, an old friend of mine, called and said “Senator East wants you to know that you are the first person on the Hill we contacted.”
Helms and East had talked about me at length. I had never been in Helms’ office, much less seen the man, but we had had a long and close relationship as fellow warriors.
People usually want to know how many times I SAW Reagan or had cocktails with the big guys. They are always disappointed when I give a vague answer. I almost never spoke with anyone on the Senate side personally, much less the Senator himself.
ANY Senator.
There is an old military saying, “Never send a man where a bullet can go.”
My rule is MORE important, because it deals with more than a skirmish in a battle that, if Congress had done its work right, would never had happened. That my rule of senior staff that is as rigid as the soldier’s rule cited above:
“Never go to a busy, literate man’s office when you can send him a memo.”
I didn’t call the bosses in until I had done ALL the groundwork and no more could be done without them.
Then I thought things out and wrote an excellent, SHORT memo. That’s why they hired a professional writer. If the man in the front office needed more, he would call me. They seldom needed to see me, and I considered it a bit of a defeat when they did.
I felt very close to Helms, although we almost never saw each other. As you can see from the example of Senator East above, he worked very closely with me. I just lost a friend and hero.
Thanks, Brian.
---------Khaldoun-Spengler Versus Race
Posted by Bob on July 2, 2008 at 6:35 pm
Filed Under General, Political Correctness | 4 Comments
One thing we will never be able to calculate is the cost of all the mulattos replacing white children. This is an obvious Catch-22. In order to know the breakthroughs that REAL white children would have produced, you would have to know what the breakthroughs would have been, but not knowing what the breakthroughs would have been is the cost we are talking about.
There is not an intellectually productive mulatto country, that is, a country with any mental breakthroughs, on earth… But we do not count that is cost, because they are all that way. It never occurs to us that the white blood thrown away there is a cost.
A world of mulattos and Orientals will think it is doing just fine. It will follow the route that al-Khaldoun described and Spengler described seven hundred years later, a retrace of ups and downs, all in the mind of the observer.
The ups will be big monuments and long periods of peace. The downs will be the opposite.
Actually I have never heard of a WHITE society going through Spengler’s “stages.” Everywhere you see a collapsed society the people became brown-skinned.
---------Dave on BUGS and Poise
Posted by Bob on June 28, 2008 at 9:32 am
Filed Under General | 5 Comments
There is a facet of poise (that Robert Whitaker excels at) that is of critical importance, and that is noticing what others do not.There are other facets of poise (excellent performance under pressure) that can be taught, but only with hard training supplemented by real world experience. This is the focus of America’s elite combat teams such as the Navy Seals.
Also, any fire fighter who has not learned poise is going to end up getting burnt. And any police officer that has not learned poise is going to end up involved in unnecessary violence.
But the core of poise, the real essence of it, is noticing what others do not.
It is a special kind of capability that focuses on mental and visual acuity and it goes beyond racial politics and its effective response. Instead, it is almost a “marital art”.
For what is Asia’s absurd obsession with badges of status other than a form of ignorance masking a society in a low state of development and a people who lack poise?
And what is Political Correctness, if it is not that very same ignorance and low state of development?
No one ever tells our school children that being intelligent is a requirement, not an elective, and it is a requirement not of the academic credit granting authority, but of the larger nature surrounding us, a nature that punishes ignorance and stupidity without fail and without mercy.
Learning this special kind of poise is what BUGS is all about, and focusing on it will furnish white nationalism its competitive advantage.
Accordingly, it is what white nationalism should strive to develop and organize itself around.
– Dave
This is a very acute observation.
Consider Dave’s general term poise and look at disciplining oneself to use the Mantra. If you do not have poise, you will go chasing off into any subject the other side brings up that interests or might make you look good with all your knowledge of it.
If you can be lured off that way, you are like any person who can be conned. There’s one born every minute.
Someone who is not a sucker has two questions about any product: “How much does it cost, and what can it do that I want done?”
And the most important word a person seeking poise can add:
PERIOD.
When you think of a person who has poise, you think of someone who has no “pressure of speech.” A poised person is not uncomfortable insisting on a reply. If you keep insisting on keeping talking off the subject, he is perfectly comfortable answering your nothing with silence. The ONLY reply a poised person will give is to remind the bullshitter of what the question was.
Poise is an EXCELLENT term for our approach.
Thanks, Dave!
---------Thanks, Simmons!
Posted by Bob on June 27, 2008 at 1:48 pm
Filed Under General | Leave a Comment
Great Leader Bob, if someone in the group gets their feathers ruffled point them out to me so I can further loosen the cult’s grip on them. It’s what I do.– Simmons
Simmons is not offering me the WORSHIP a Great Leader deserves. Despite all his promises, if the choice is between Bob and the truth, he will leave me out here shivering in the cold.
I can live with that. In fact, I couldn’t be at ease with anything else.
What Simmons offers is critical. When someone criticizes me, there are two poles to the possibilities, 1) they misunderstood me or 2) I need some correction. I prefer 1), as any human being would.
But 0) REALLY upsets me. After all my work here, someone, usually Shari, wants more explanation, and most of you go dumb. Simmons says he won’t.
On Stormfront, it is SUCH a relief for an old warrior who says he is used to battling alone to have Lord Nelson or Prometheus jump in on his side.
Yes, I have spent a lifetime fighting alone, but I would not wish that fate on any one of you.
BACK UP YOUR COMRADES. NEVER LEAVE THEM ALONE.
Constructive criticism is infinitely better than empty space. But jumping in where you are needed, as Simmons offers to do, is best of all.
---------The FCC Revolt
Posted by Bob on June 27, 2008 at 12:41 pm
Filed Under General | 1 Comment
— The FCC Revolt
I am not referring to the federal agency but to the Faithful Colored Companions (FCC) who have slavishly voted for white liberals down through the years.
I TOLD YOU SO!
For years now, while others repeated news items about Iraq and the Jews, I kept insisting that a huge development was on the horizon. While others agreed with each other that all was lost because minorities and anti-white whites formed a growing majority, I kept pointing out that this coalition might be unstable.
In Whitakeronline.org I have said for YEARS that the Faithful Colored Companions were eventually going to want to vote for their OWN. I am the only person who mentions that this happened to the NAACP when, sixty years after its founding, it elected its first BLACK president. The NAACP has been a harmless cash cow for suburban blacks ever since.
There is a huge divide here. Jews and liberal whites are monomaniacally dedicated to the end of the white race. Blacks want stuff for themselves. To anti-whites reparations means a renewed dedication to Racial Guilt and shame on the part of those who don’t like to see whites with colored kids.
To blacks, reparations is a brand-new Mercedes.
REAL power politics is not detailing the Bad Guys and the Good Guys. Power politics is finding out what everybody WANTS. Anti-whites who are being displaced have only one goal, the end of whites.
If we handle it right, the FCC doesn’t want our blood.
It wants our money.
---------Reply on Diplomacy
Posted by Bob on June 27, 2008 at 9:46 am
Filed Under General | 4 Comments
Someone wrote me that I should be more diplomatic.
The relevant part of my reply is here:
When it comes to using a dumb electorate, “diplomacy” (though I would refer to it as something else) is a good idea. When it comes to discussion within a serious leadership group this is not the case.”
“My experience includes a long list of examples. One guy in college would come out to help picket or something, get offended by what somebody said — seldom me — and then, I kid you not, start crying and run off. Sometimes he took others with him.”
“He was ALWAYS a liability.”
In the real rough and rumble pro-whties face you had better get rid of the ones who will run away.
It’s time to stop obsessing on non-racial matters. If someone will run out because of what one old guy says, it’s better for him to run now instead of standing up bravely like respectable conservatives do and then backing out when things get serious.
---------Ghosties and Goblins and Things That Go “JEW!!” in the Night
Posted by Bob on June 26, 2008 at 10:56 am
Filed Under General | 7 Comments
No one can find a single word in the Old Testament that even vaguely advocates the chastity that early Christians were so fanatical about. So they just don’t THINK about it. No “Christian” thinks about it because he would have to think about the ORIGIN, the REAL origin, of his faith.
But he is REQUIRED to look for every bit of the origin of Christianity in the Old Testament.
If it’s not there, he stops looking for it.
For two thousand years, the absence of this anti-sexual obsession SHOULD have stood out like a sore thumb. It took a heritage of rigid thought control to avoid it.
This is also where our concept of Jews as Supermen comes from.
Here we are, a perfect white Christian society with Traditional Values, and along comes somebody, Satan or the Jews or both, to CAUSE every single weakness and absurdity we carry with us. They did not just take advantage of some obvious weaknesses in our mentality. We were perfect, so they had to CREATE all what was wrong.
This is childish. Enemies do not create your weaknesses, they exploit them. It is up to you to REALIZE what your weaknesses are, even if doing so is HERESY to the Perfect People crowd.
I have told this story before. In 1870 France had a bigger army than that of Prussia, but the Prussians won because they moved faster and from unexpected directions. In 1914 France had a larger available army than Germany, which was fighting on two fronts. But the Germans moved faster and from unexpected directions so the entire war was fought deep inside France. In 1940 France had forces the size of the Wehrmacht, but the Germans moved faster and in unexpected directions and took France again.
I am sure the French General Staff waved their fists at the Germans and talked about how MEAN the Devil Huns were. Because they see Germans as the Devil, the next war would be exactly the same.
In 1775 at Breed’s Hill, the British were slaughtered because they marched in formation European-style while the Americans hunkered down and shot them to pieces. Two wars and almost exactly forty years later, the British were slaughtered at New Orleans because they marched in formation European-style while the Americans hunkered down and shot them to pieces.
British generals told each other that Americans were just DEVILS.
The obsession with chastity came from an old, degenerate version of the Aryan religion called Zoroastrianism, then in its death throes. The idea that it is holy for us to not have children lives on in today’s environmentalism and was instrumental in our Zero Population Growth movement. Today having children is denounced by NOW as evil. All that matters is that the couple is in a State of Love when copulation occurs.
The idea that destroying one’s own race is the holiest of missions certainly did not come from Jews. They exploited what was already in our culture.
The Jews did not CREATE this mental illness, they EXPLOITED it. To Zoroastrians the God of THIS World, Ahriman, was evil, the God of the Next, Ahura Mazda, was good. As Zoroastrianism degenerated, all thoughts of continuing the people of THIS world became evil.
Or we can keep searching in the Old Testament for some hint that sterility is holy.
And worship Jews as Evil Gods.
Be sure there’s someone around to drive you home from Kindergarten.
---------What Words Can Do, Words Can Undo
Posted by Bob on June 26, 2008 at 9:27 am
Filed Under General | 7 Comments
Utah could not enter the Union until it outlawed polygamy. Right on time, in 1890, a Mormon leader had a Revelation from God. God decided in 1890 that polygamy, which Joseph Smith had forcefully defended as a Key tot eh Kingdom, had to go. This happened to coincide nicely with getting Utah statehood.
Just when Joseph Smith’s prohibition against black bishops became politically untenable, the Lord stepped in and gave the Mormons another Divine Inspiration to decarve that Law from the Sacred Tomes.
Governor David Beasley had his Revelation from God in December 2008, right after he had used the pro-Confederate flag vote get reelected governor, and in the maximum amount of time before the 2000 Republican Convention where he hoped to obtain the vie-presidential nomination.
It must have been a joint Revelation. When the money men turned on the Confederate flag and forced the Citadel to abandon it, Bob Jones IV had a Direct Inspiration to get rid of the flag, too. Also to allow interracial dating.
And the list goes on.
When someone starts saying he is pro-white because of the Bible, I realize that tomorrow he can be ANTI-white because of the same Bible. It happens all the time. The same First Baptist Church in Columbia that hosted the secession convention in 1960 because God was pro-slavery was trying to get affirmative action into its congregation in the 1980s on the basis of the same Bible.
If your loyalty is to words, you can interpret those words into the opposite overnight. “We the People of the United States… and our Posterity” now includes illegal aliens.
What happens when someone who espouses your words is fighting against someone who is of your race?
You get World War II.
I like to level with you. When someone says his feeling for our race is because of the Catholic Church or the Christian faith or a belief in liberty or some other set of words, I back up a little. This is based on lifetime of HARD experience.
I only back off a LITTLE, but I do back off SOME.
As I say, I like to level with you.
---------The People’s Gospels
Posted by Bob on June 24, 2008 at 11:19 am
Filed Under General | 3 Comments
In the documentary on the new-found Gospel of Judas, one thing that was mentioned rather shame-facedly was that a major reason Matthew, Mark, Luke and John were chosen as anonical Gospels was because Christians LIKED them. Like any other institution the Church paid attention to the books people favored.
That tookme bck to my childhood, lisening to the story of Christmas inteh St James version. As I said, the dozens of other gospel versions were written largely for intellectual snobs, not the kind of common folk Jesus went out and preached to.
Inspitration does not come ecclusively from bishops or theologians. The last thing Peter was was an intellectual snob. I think believe that believers in general had true inspiration. The popularity and easier-to-read character of the Gospels chosen bothers the documentary-makers. But it makes me more confident that the Gospels chosen SHOULD be the canonical ones.
---------Why Do We HAVE Jews?
Posted by Bob on June 23, 2008 at 4:48 am
Filed Under General | 6 Comments
Nobody EVER thinks in BASICS.
Moslems in huge numbers are new to our society.
While the Jews poured into Northern Europe umpteen centuries ago the religion of our ACTUAL Fathers, Odinism, was being stamped out. “Chistianity” — by which I mean the Wordist institutions that grew up using the name of Christ — did not “discriminate aganst” Odinist holdouts. It KILLED them.
Catholic countries didn’t “discriminate against” Protestants and Protestants countries did not “discriminate against” Catholics.
They KILLED them.
Christian countries did not “discriminate against” Moslems who moved in.
The KILLED them.
We had Jews because our Glorious Traditional Values ALLOWED them.
Our Glorious Traditional Values ALLOWED enemies to exist within our society.
The resident aliens did what resident aliens can be expected to do.
I am NOT a conservative.
---------Self-Hate? Well, DUHH!
Posted by Bob on June 22, 2008 at 10:13 am
Filed Under General | 11 Comments
Secular historians agree what the greatest American theologian was Jonathan Edwards in the eighteenth century.
Here’s a sample of Edwards’ Puritan Wisdom:
The Eternity of Hell Torments
by Jonathan Edwards
Fourth, the sight of hell torments will exalt the happiness of the saints forever. It will not only make them more sensible of the greatness and freeness of the grace of God in their happiness, but it will really make their happiness the greater, as it will make them more sensible of their own happiness. It will give them a more lively relish of it: it will make them prize it more. When they see others, who were of the same nature and born under the same circumstances, plunged in such misery, and they so distinguished, O it will make them sensible how happy they are. A SENSE OF THE OPPOSITE MISERY, IN ALL CASES, GREATLY INCREASES THE RELISH OF ANY JOY OR PLEASURE.
*********************************
Edwards represented the Calvinist reaction to Catholicism.
The Medieval Church, by which I mean the Wordist institution that grew up using the name of Christ, had an interesting version of “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.” They insisted that what a truly Holy Man would do to himself was to starve, go without sleep, wear hair shirts, and effectively castrate himself.
I said EFFECTIVELY because they condemned Origen when he PHYSICALLY castrated himself to remove temptation. Such a cheap out as not allowed. You had to SUFFER the lack of sex your whole life, or God didn’t get any fun out of it.
Protestants never disagreed with this. They felt this suffering was too undemocratic.
In fact, the only outrages Protestants talked about with monks was when monks DID have sex and fun.
Puritans insisted that EVERYONE should get in on the suffering.
How could a people with good, healthy Traditional values like that have ended up declaring that the highest morality consists of destroying their own race?
It had to be the Jews that did it.
---------Simmons
Posted by Bob on June 22, 2008 at 9:29 am
Filed Under General | 3 Comments
PC is a religion, that means it places things off limits to debate behind an esoteric cloud of verbiage. In America that is its weakness leaving it open to a ceaseless barrage of never ending ridicule of its high handedness. But respectables being robe worshipers counter with esoteric nonsense themselves, they lose.
It really is that easy to defeat PC and liberalism there is nothing there but smoke and mirrors, even Dorothy had enough and wanted to ask questions of the witch directly. Dorothy was Mantra thinking before Bob was being Bob its right in front of us.
Enough of my high handedness I have to go back to destroying a Jew’s arguments against Iran. I’m asking him directly what his religion’s end times dictates are versus the crazies of Iran to see if we need to listen to either side in that spat.
– Simmons
---------Pain
Posted by Bob on June 21, 2008 at 7:34 am
Filed Under General | 4 Comments
One reason people pay any attention at all to the Media is that they still worship status, are suspicious of authority, and don’t know the difference between the two. Once they realize that truth is more valuable to them than a glitzy broadcast, the revolution is already done.
–Pain
One thing that always puzzled Europeans about Americans was that we were very religious and at the same time we were anti-clerical all the way to the gut.
We think of Catholics as the most obedient to religious authority. Yet even American Catholics naturally react this way,
American Catholics are the mainstay of that church throughout the world. A priest once told me that American Catholics benefited from the fact that this is a very deeply religious country.
Unlike other countries, where most people are Catholic simply by default, Catholics here have an attendance record and pay for their churches on a scale that, while we bitch about it, leaves the rest of the world in awe.
Here there are a lot of bitches about the priest shortage. But other countries today produce almost no priests at all.
Practicing American Catholics are known to routinely ignore the Pope’s more extreme pronouncements on birth control and the like.
But they don’t do this for the European reason, Europeans simply don’t take their faith seriously and that is the reason they ignore what the Pope says.
Practicing American Catholics ignore the Curia when it writes up a fashionable statement that capital punishment is evil. This is not an irreligious attitude. They simply don’t think such social dictates are necessary to the Catholic RELIGION.
Ignoring the preacher when he doesn’t make sense is traditional here. We are RELIGIOUS, not SLAVISH.
I think that, in order to follow Pain’s advice, we need to get that back same natural American attitude toward the priest of our PRESNT established religion.
It is important to remember that that attitude is deep in our national consciousness.
I see it on the Internet all the time. That is why constant reference to “repeating what Mommy Professor says” is such a deadly effective tactic in online debate.
Look at the responses. Europeans and South American are always looking for a religious or Intellectual or Titled Authority to adhere to. This Mommy Professor stuff makes this habitual dependence so clear that it even bothers THEM.
But the “Mommy Professor” truth makes AMERICANS on the Net go ballistic.
---------The Snob’s Road to Hell
Posted by Bob on June 21, 2008 at 6:46 am
Filed Under General | 1 Comment
One of the two people Jesus specifically condemned to Hell was the Jewish High Priest who read and knew the Old Testament backward and forward, as modern preachers recommend as the Path to Heaven. Jesus made it clear that that high priest preached and followed The Law perfectly. He stood at the front of the Temple and proudly depended on his adherence and his reading.
Unseen in the back of the Temple was a sinner and back-slider who meekly admitted his failures, present and future, and begged to be forgiven for them. HE, said Jesus, was saved.
This parable may have meant nothing. Jesus may have just been gassing off.
I doubt it.
It is downright funny that the Bible should say “Wise Men from the East” as a code-word for priests of the Zoroastrian faith.
Today scholars say the same thing, “Ex Oriente Lux”, “Light Comes from the East”
But today they mean that all knowledge and wisdom comes from Israel and Egypt and Mesopotamians on both sides of Israel.
When scholars said “Ex Oriente Lux”, “Light Comes from the East” today they mean that all knowledge and wisdom comes from Israel and Egypt and Mesopotamians on both sides of Israel.
But in Matthew, Israel was the Western Place the Wise Men rom the East came TO.
Today a “Christian theologian” likes to sound profound by denouncing everything he disapproves of in early Christian days as “Gnostic.” It sounds impressive and is nice and vague, like all phrases used by intellectual snobs. .
The actual Gnostics were snobs, too. They said that salvation was not for the common people — you know, the ones Jesus went out and preached to. Salvation was for Intellectuals who Truly Understood the Secrets in the Book.
In early Christian times those Secrets had an Iranian flavor. They were from the Orient of THAT day.
Gnostics separated the God of This World from the True God. In the newly-found Gospel of Judas, Jesus LAUGHS at the Disciples who are sacrificing to Jehovah and explains to Judas that they are worshipping The God of THIS World. If you know anything about Zoroastrianism, which modern theologians don’t, you will immediately recognize the Zoroastrian separation of Ahura Mazda, the Good God of the Next World, from Ahriman, the Zoroastrian Satan from whom we get our Satan, who was the creator and God of THIS world.
The Gospel of Judas was excluded from the canon because it was a Gnostic Gospel BACK WHEN PEOPLE KNEW WHAT “GNOSTIC MEANT.
Theologians and Renaissance “intellectuals” are and were still just snobs.
They just had a different “Orient” in mind.
---------AFKAN
Posted by Bob on June 20, 2008 at 8:53 am
Filed Under General | 5 Comments
Yet - and this is part and parcel of the power of widespread color television - see Strom and Humphrey in the context of their times, and see why neither would last for five minutes today.Thurmond dealt with the First Great Depression by working, and working more, in ever more valuable jobs and professions; he dealt with WWII by enlisting.
Humphrey’s family all but lost their family business, a pharmacy in South Dakota, during the end of the Roaring Twenties. They moved, and stayed in the drugstore business, seeing the First Great Depression as it played out on the Great Plains. Humphrey always want to teach college, and didn’t qualify for WWII for medical reasons. He taught college in DC during the war.
Thurmonds’ life story is quite impressive; Humphrey, that of a man who knows One Big Thing, and ran the table with it.
Both spoke for the tremendous sectional differences that were in place in America, even in 1948 - this, before widespread television.
“Professional journalists” - another archaic “profession” in the day of the blogosphere - are now providing entertaining commentary on the entertainment, as people see the major trends as being pretty much locked in place, and changes only occur on the margin. REAL political changes, take place because a Federal judge says so; the politicians then hide behind his dress.
Ever wonder why the transformational political decisions from the Federal judiciary come, at least as seen by the public, from the men, particularly older, White men?
The Indoctrination of the Self-Proclaimed Greatest Generation seems to have worked; they respond damn near automatically, like beaten dog
– AFKAN
*******************************************************************
*******************************************************************
*******************************************************************
— BOB’S NOTE:
“this is part and parcel of the power of widespread color television ”
NEVER FORGET that when you discuss the power the old media had, you are also saying what power the NEW media can have.
---------New Age Politics and the Media
Posted by Bob on June 19, 2008 at 8:57 am
Filed Under General | 3 Comments
Back in the 60s I noted a change in the nature of politicians. No one else understood what I was talking about, as usual.
I put it this way: If a Strom Thurmond or even a Hubert Humphrey were lost for two weeks on a trip and gave a press conference, they would hold a press conference at which they would speak off the top of their heads.
If a New Type politician was lost for two weeks, a Lott or a Dukakis, eh would hole the press conference until he had read over the newspapers and seen the latest polls.
On talk shows, media people always say, “The question is whether he will screw up during the campaign.”
These same media types then bitch about how both sides are so negative. They wonder why the public is not interested in a candidate’s program but only on the dirt.
They just SAID that the campaign IS the dirt. The campaign IS the screwups.
If you want to make a LIVING as a reporter, you send your editor what he wants to PRINT. When he hands out a paper droning on abut some policy initiative, you are thinking about how to use the question time to get him to screw up, to say something Jesse Jackson or NOW can declare is Evil.
“Professional” has only one meaning: You get PAID.
For a “professional journalist” a campaign is the screwups, not policy.
The changeover from the Ole Stroms to the new Lotts came largely because of the simple fact that campaigns meant less and less each time. People elected Strom or Humphrey because they MATTERED, and when Ole Strom or the Ecstatic Frog said something stupid it was just entertaining.
Strom was fighting integration and Humphrey was putting civil rights platforms into the Democratic Platform. Harry Byrd was fighting every expenditure and liberals were pushing whole new areas of taxation. Nobody was going to give up those critical matters over a silly remark.
Today in terms of real policy the only difference between Obama and Clinton is, IN FACT, the color of the skin. Every dime that can REALLY be spent is being spent, every tax that can in real politics be taxed is BEING taxed.
“Civil rights” and every other critical non-fiscal issue is decided it the courts, not in the White House or in Congress. All that is LEFT to vote on is looks. All that is LEFT to report on is verbal screwups.
---------Dave
Posted by Bob on June 19, 2008 at 8:00 am
Filed Under General | Leave a Comment
For being such a “slothful” person Bob Whitaker certainly doesn’t suffer logical inconsistency. That’s because he fully comprehends that one of life’s greatest errors is conceit, for it is the hardest error that anyone has charging himself with.Understanding this is how you get to know politics. And when BW says, “What creates the future goes unnoticed”, he is simply stating what the conceited don’t see: “Death walks on cat’s feet”.
That’s why you need to be young to get conned into fighting a war. It is invariably too late to discover how you have been betrayed.
There is a reason veterans come back bitter.
But rest assured no “anti-war” type could ever really understand this. They are too busy serving Political Correctness for that.
Also there is another contradiction: A revolution depends upon repenting conceit and fully comprehending how it leads to error. That’s how you get a “leg up” on the opposition.
But don’t worry about the secret getting out. Rest assured, it won’t.
“Death walks on cat’s feet.”
BRILLIANT insight!
My caps:
“A revolution depends upon REPENTING conceit and FULLY COMPREHENDING how it leads to error.”
and
“But don’t worry about the secret getting out. Rest assured, it won’t.”
The secret WILL get out out with our new modes of communication. That is why anti-whites spend such titanic resources and concentrate monomaniacally on suppressing even tiny groups of tattle-tales like us.
---------Keep It Up, Shari!
Posted by Bob on June 18, 2008 at 10:43 am
Filed Under General | 3 Comments
Shari won’t settle for something until she UNDERSTANDS it and she is not afraid to ask questions. Her short comments are a major force in keeping our Comments humming.
READ THE COMMENTS!
---------Prometheus (General Comments) Shows How One Learns From PRACTICE
Posted by Bob on June 18, 2008 at 10:25 am
Filed Under General | Leave a Comment
http://www.theage.com.au/world/drastic-rise-in-japans-migrant-intake-urged-20080616-2rkl.html?page=1A group of 80 politicians from the ruling Liberal Democratic Party has called for a drastic increase in the ratio of immigrants in Japan to 10% of the population
Prometheus says:
Of course, no anti-racists has ever proposed this as a solution for Japan. No anti-racist has ever demanded Japan take in the third world, but every anti-racist states that they would have no problem with a non-white race or nation becoming multiracial.They ignore the racial aspect of demographic change in Fiji and Tibet, but liberalism can’t keep pretending it is race neutral forever. They can get away with ignoring the demise of whites, but can they get away with supporting the demise of a non-white race? Can they get away with not saying anything in their defense?
If in the future non-whites get up and demand EXACTLY what we demand for our race, what will our faithful anti-whites do?
– Prometheus
Prometheus and I were doing our act in Opposing Views when an anti-white tried to answer the Mantra by pointing out that a lot of oil-rich Arab countries were importing non-Arab labor. Instead of going into the obvious economics and so forth here, i just shoved their noses in the Mantra again.
As Prometheus expands on it here, the key word in the Mantra is DEMANDS. A Japanese political party may PROPOSE immigration, but EVERY RACE demands that EVERY white country and ONLY white countries ALL import AND ASSIMILATE, something no Moslem country is asked to do.
Before you answer THEM go back to OUR basics. Before you answer them get a handle on what they are REALLY saying.
Hit them at the ROOTS and
STAY ON MESSAGE.
---------Where Was the Yeast?
Posted by Bob on June 17, 2008 at 6:36 pm
Filed Under General | 6 Comments
Every tiny Medieval village contained several makers of ale. The ale had little nutritional value, but it cantained precious calories in a population on the edge of starvation.
Empty calories. Protein was out the question. They were always starved for protein.
If they had consumed the yeast which wa a natural product of the quarts of ale they drank daily, all of which is pure protein, not to mantion Vitamin D, they might have been very healthy indeed.
Then again if the distilled alcohol poured down a wounded person’s throat to help ease the pain of wounds had been used on the wounds …
But the people only listened to Intellectuals and Priests.
What they got, they EARNED.
---------Simmons is Out There!
Posted by Bob on June 17, 2008 at 3:35 pm
Filed Under General | 1 Comment
Pick out one of the bunch for critique, concentrate your fire on that person, but try and do so in an objective way so as to not allow personal feelings turn it into a grudge match. I’ll give a semi-successful example; a guy named Nugent occasionally posts at Liberty Forum and I spotted him instantly as a self selected witch doctor soothsayer for the “Jewish problem” looking to build a small audience who need that kind of thing (kind of like where Duke is right now). I vowed to make that guy useful right to his face so to say since he was in fact nearly useless by trying to be a mommy prof without the endowment. In short I tried to force the concept of the Moot onto him in place of him spewing the esoteric nonsense that requires a low priest to decipher for the children. I doubt we have a Whitakerite with John de Nugent, but there is always hope that a fire was started.— Simmons
You know what the rule is: we don’t need convert someone into a full BUGS man, we take what you can get us. A kill is better, but a casualty will do.
“a mommy prof without the endowment.”
BUGS is building the set of key expressions UNIQUE TO ITSELF that every successful movement must have.
Our Moot is invaluable of itself. But it REALLY gives me much-needed boost when you tell me tales of your ACTION out there in the field. Prometheus gave me one in the article you are commenting on, and yours was another.
I NEED the boosts I get when I see Lord Nelson and Prometheus and other over in SF practicing their craft on anti-whites and reminding SF members of OUR basics.
Antonio Fini just put a BUGS piece in the Sustains Members section. I was enormously grateful since I am almost always the only one who does that.
The obvious excuse is, “I don’t do that because Bob should have the privilege” Nice try, but no cigar.
“Oh, Lord, what if I put it in when Bob has already put it in, or if I scoop Bob by putting it in?”
In the first place your putting it in too prevents me the continuing embarrassment of looking like n egomaniac whose only purpose is to promote “Bob Blog.” If you put it in, too, it just shows that I am not the only person who thought it was worth SF’s attention.
Putting BUGS pieces into SF would take very little of your effort, but it makes all the difference to me.
This is done so little I faced on Stormfront guy who insisted that I was the only person interested in this BUGS thing.
Our Moot is a heritage we are reinventing. It is critical in itself. But your tales of how you APPLIED our approach in the field and quoting or referring to BUGS pieces in Stormfront and elsewhere give me a boost I NEED.
Help me out, gang!
---------