FOX’s Anti-White Initiative
Posted by Bob on February 8, 2010 at 5:32 am
Filed Under Coaching Session | 5 Comments
Like all respectable conservatives FOX is trying to get every Haitian under the age of forty adopted into American families. And they are GLORYING in it.
“We the People of the United States and OUR Prosperity.” That is the ONLY state authority and the ONLY stated PURPOSE Americans have ever adopted. This is the rock on which any possible alliance with the respectable right breaks up.
This is what the respectable right GLORIES in. Nothing makes a respectable conservative so sickeningly righteous as when they out-liberal the liberals. They are so smug, they are so PROUD.
This is the poison in the so-called Pro-Life Movement. They are never so ecstatic as when they can crow about how they value the beating heart of the fifteenth baby in a family in Ethiopia as t hey do for the any American white American child. Mindlessness is always costly.
As Larry Niven says, “Stupidity has always been a capital offense.”
Nothing is more fatal to scientific advance than MILITANT ignorance. Nothing is more deadly to human beings than mindless “Idealism.”
Genocide is fine with conservatives as long as it is done by “assimilation.” In fact, they are droolingly proud of that. When I developed the Mantra it was my last break with conservatism. Conservatives’ main argument against Hispanics and Moslems is that refuse to date and marry the conservatives’ offspring.
The Mantra makes it clear that there is no compromise with this “assimilation” method of genocide. And nothing else on the political horizon makes this clear.
---------Porch wisdom
Posted by Bob on February 7, 2010 at 7:28 am
Filed Under Bob, Coaching Session | 6 Comments
Pierce’s comment that he had no one living to take his place has haunted me. After his death, his great words and movement lost the coherence he had given it. One reason for this may have been that Pierce was TOO brilliant. He would have been dissatisfied with anyone because no one had the breadth of knowledge he had.
I am, as Brian so well put it, an old man with experience to relate, knowledge to share, a Porch Talker. All of us raised with the Porch Talkers were given what young people SHOULD be given, a non-nonsense world view, a Way of Thinking. Grandpa never told us he was a hero like the Greatest Generation or what we had to believe to be Real Men. Grandpa never claimed to be as brilliant as Dr. Pierce REALLY WAS.
Old Grandpa used to say…” never end with a point of absolute Doctrine. And he did not give us that overworked capitalized term, Wisdom. He gave us the real thing, the small-lettered wisdom.
Porch wisdom was not aimed at What You Youngsters Should Be. It was not What You Youngsters Should Believe. It was little bits of practical mental experience that can be used by a priest or an atheist, a doctor or lawyer or Indian Chief. In fact it was the kind of real wisdom that put the Indian chiefs out of business while they spouted Ancient Wisdom.
For that we were supposed to go to the Preacher on Sunday. The Preacher was boring and he got us there by force. We listened to porch talk with pleasure. I remember when I had an exam coming and I had to study my books while I could hear the talk going on when an old guy was visiting. It was torture! I wanted to be out there so BAD!
As Brian notes, porch wisdom consist of “This is how I did it right and this is how I did it wrong.” No self-righteous Mommy Professor demanding you adhere to The Line.
In fact, I can tell WHICH old man’s porch talk my family is quoting without their giving the name. He had a consistency there, as clear as the Preacher or Mommy Professor, but it was not how to Avoid Damnation or Mommy Professor’s constant theme of How Great the World Would Be IF Me and My Fellow Idealists and Intellectuals ruled the World.
You certainly can’t identify a particular preacher or Mommy Professor by quoting him. Mommy Professors all say the same thing and the Preacher always says something that clearly came from a Pulpit, and not just on religious matters.
But Porch Talk IS consistent. The old man has a worldview, or, less grandiosely, he has a tested idea of WHAT WORKS. His stories range around a whole lifetime, but if you listen, the VIEW is consistent, which is why we can tell WHICH old man said it.
And each of them left a LEGACY, not a set of carbon copies.
---------An Apology and a Thank God for Brian
Posted by Bob on February 6, 2010 at 1:00 pm
Filed Under Bob, Comment Responses | Leave a Comment
When Brian started the new General Comments it was a terrible shock to me. I have not been looking in that section for months! It had petered out, so I didn’t look at it.
I felt I had let you down horribly. But now that I HAVE looked at them, I am much happier about the whole thing. General Comments are excellent and, what came as a relief to me, you didn’t NEED me there!
“Our discussion is going very well, Bob, thank you very much.”
This last is a critically important point. That, in fact, is what gives BUGS a future. I don’t think any Leader in politics, left, right, or pro-white, would be relieved to find that things are going right along without him.
And that, ladies and gentlemen, is the key to our success.
After my guilt rush, I am enjoying reading the General Comments.
Skype-writing Brian a few days ago I happened in on a conversation on which Lord Nelson was having with him, which was supposed to include me after I had gone away abruptly as Brian allows me to do. It was GREAT!
Brian and Lord Nelson were discussing your ongoing activities, from White Rabbit to, one by one, most of our regular commenters and other BUGSers besides. You are not only going out and DOING it, you are going out and DOING it in a MENTALLY DISCIPLINED way.
Every reminder I would have put in was emphasized between Brian and Lord Nelson, with some additions that were dead on the money and I would be proud to have made myself. I was glad I missed the discussion because I was afraid I might screw it up.
Even better, the discussion was about how YOU keep forcing each other back on track.
I have a legacy!
---------Aid to Haiti
Posted by Bob on February 6, 2010 at 6:42 am
Filed Under Coaching Session | 7 Comments
Communism accomplished one thing that was truly unique. They managed the only white countries on earth that managed to live like third worlders. While Japan and Germany got from desperation to American living standards, Russia and China managed to remain completely stagnant. Today Communist Mozambique has managed a feat once thought impossible: they actually have a living standard as low as that of HAITI!
I believe The Comedians, with Richard Burton and Elizabeth Taylor was the only movie I have ever seen which actually showed third-world reality without the whole movie being devoted to showing the CIA or white men in coats and ties were responsible. The movie, even with Peter Ustinov and Alec Guinness, was a total box office flop.
No one noticed that Ethiopian children were starving, not because of white men in coats and ties, but because the ample food supplies being sent were blocked by Communists and stolen by locals.
The bottom line is that no one CARES about starving Ethiopian children or starving Haitians. If they did they would be raising hell about the Communist blockade of Ethiopia and about the stealing of children’s food locally, because you can’t do anything about it THERE as long as these things are in place.
But, just as Futurology has nothing to do with the future, Food for Children seldom has anything to do with starving children. They are not doing anything that happens THERE. The promoters are HERE, just as Futurology has no interest in the future, its job is to get publish NOW, to become famous NOW, to become Futurology Experts NOW.
As long as children keep starving in Ethiopia, you can raise huge amounts of money HERE. Those who blockade and steal the food keep the money-raisers in cash and get a lot of fame for those who want a fashionable cause to push.
Money is not the only, or even the main payoff starving black children provide. Jane Fonda talked about “starving children in upstate South Carolina.” She doesn’t even know what starvation IS. No one really criticizes her for this, because it makes no difference HERE. She is using the standard word “starvation” to push her political agenda and everybody knows it.
And no one CARES what it really is THERE.
Haiti is one of the very, very few countries on earth which has managed to routinely STARVE its children with no outside aid. As in Ethiopia no matter how much aid you pour in it is the LOCALS who will get their share before any of it gets to anybody poor.
In fact, when it comes to actual starvation, only pure imperialism can possibly work. And it is “imperialism” that the local authorities use to be sure THEY get the stuff first. It is a classic Catch-22: a country is going to have starving children if the locals are stupid, greedy, merciless and all the things you are not allowed to say about third world countries.
Compared to avoiding saying things you shouldn’t say, starving children mean nothing at all.
---------No Bad Reds on TV
Posted by Bob on February 5, 2010 at 6:27 am
Filed Under Coaching Session | 3 Comments
One of these days I am going to see a bad Communist on TV.
Maybe.
I have seen villages after The People’s Friends got through with them. I have seen what is left of men they captured. I have never seen either on TV.
One American woman got into trouble in South America. She was wearing a fashionable tee-shirt with Chinese written on it, and it never occurred to her that Latin American peasants in the back country would recognize a Chinese slogan popular — and unrecognized — in Yuppie San Francisco.
They had seen it before. It was carried by the Shining Path guerrillas, a Progressive Socialist group down there.
Americans tend to idolize law-breakers like John Dillinger and Bonnie and Clyde, so the left uses this lawless tendency to advertise Shining Path and Che Guevara. But John Dillinger only killed one person and that was accidental. Che was a little different.
As with Lenin and Trotsky, also worshiped by our left, Che loudly proclaimed and practiced “Terrorism,” mass killings, torture to an extent you don’t want to hear about. They would call Dillinger and even Bonnie and Clyde “bourgeois,” as in bourgeois thinking.”
Communism sees all income distribution as a “political matter.” Anyone who has anything stole it from someone else. The is no other consideration. Not only is religion the Opiate of the Masses, but every value which takes one mind off the Objective Goal is a diversion from Reality. As with the Inquisition, mercy is such a diversion.
The Church said that mercy got in the way of Mercy. Burn ‘em SLOW so they learned what the flames of Hell were like, use fire to save them from the hotter and Eternal fire. The Communists had no ideas that fanatics had not practiced earlier. And Nazis had no ideas that were not already in action among Communists.
Institutions are always alike, because they compete with each other. Every institutions sees things like simple mercy or simple truth as delusions, EVIL delusions. For the Church they came from the Devil. For Nazis they came from Jews, for Communists they are the product of the bourgeoisie.
When sadists unleash this kind of “morality” on Latin Americans, they recognize the Chinese phrase that came with it.
---------General Comments 3
Posted by Brian on February 4, 2010 at 3:01 pm
Filed Under General | 5 Comments
The old one is getting long and acting up, so I’m opening up a new one.
---------The Alien and Sedition Acts
Posted by Bob on February 4, 2010 at 7:37 am
Filed Under Coaching Session | 2 Comments
It is usually said that the court protects our constitutional rights. This is the major argument that has led us to the point that, today, the Court IS the Constitution. As a matter of fact the United States its free speech crisis before Marshall became Chief Justice, and Marshall in 1801 began, timidly, the process of making the Court into the Constitution.
It should be particularly important toe the dozen or so American who actually know our history that the British courts, in the case of hate crimes, have reinstituted the doctrine of “The truth is no defense.” That was the theme of the last Federalist Congress in the two years of the Alien and Sedition Acts.
That crisis is also familiar for us today. American feared the Terror of the French Revolution. In 1798 the Federalists won a huge victory in congressional election because Jefferson’s Republicans showed hostility to Britain and accommodation to the French.
With its overwhelming majority President Adams and his Federalists passed the Alien and Sedition Acts which put Jefferson and all opposition under threat of imprisonment. This was an attempt to keep any real opposition party. It almost succeeded.
Criticism of Federalist policy became a crime. It was a Gag Law. No one knew exactly what violated the law until one was arrested.
Above all, the opposition could not tell the truth. Truth was not a defense. Truth is, after all, all an opposition has to fight with. It is not coincidental that people in power want truth to be no defense. If truth is a defense, you KNOW what you CAN say.
So in 1799 hundreds of opposition were put in prison. In response to French Terror, we had our own Terror.
Sound familiar?
Another note that would be familiar in Britain today was that the courts not only didn’t defend the Constitution, they ruled that the truth did not matter, they ruled that what DID matter was giving offense, truthfully or untruthfully, to a certain group of people. That certain group of people in 1799 was public officials rather than minorities but the principle was exactly the same.
Today any inconvenient truth is racism, just as the excuse then was that truth was anti-government.
The Alien and Sedition Acts were a combination of Bush’s War on Terror and liberal Hate Laws.
The gag laws did not work. But it was the PEOPLE who reversed them. In 1800, largely because the Federalists had demonstrated that they were as despotic as the most extreme Republican had claimed, were defeated overwhelmingly for the presidency as well as congress.
After the Alien and Sedition Acts, the Federalists got less votes at every election until they soon ceased to exist. Their last office holder was Chief Justice Marshall, appointed by Adams as he left office in 1801. One of the architects of the Alien and Sedition Acts became Chief Justice.
When Marshall took over the Court, all its members had been appointed by Federalists and all of them supported the Alien and Sedition Acts. They began, timidly at first, to rule that the court was there to keep the voters in line. There were seven of them then.
Those seven men faced an electorate which totally rejected unchallenged rule by the oligarchy represented by the Federalists. Congress and President Jefferson were, specifically, against the idea that the truth was no defense. In 1801 every member of the Court was for it.
The Court began to slowly to extend its power under Marshall’s leadership.
Then as now, the Court began to use its power for the powers that be and against the people.
---------The Left Meets the Mantra
Posted by Bob on February 2, 2010 at 2:16 pm
Filed Under Coaching Session | 10 Comments
I have noticed that leftists tried to reply to one of our commenters using the Mantra. Their reply was that Mantra users were, thought they don’t say it, stealing THEIR thunder. We are “exploiters claiming victim status.”
If you don’t know Marxists theology well, the idea that white non-whites cannot be racist puzzles you. That is, in your terms, a racist concept. But Marxism looks at the world entirely in victim versus exploiter terms. When it comes to race, only one group can be exploiters.
“The distribution of income, said Marx, “is a POLITICAL question.” It is an outstanding fact of Marxist thought that there is no such thing as economics. In Marxism there is no such thing as race relations. There is only exploited and exploiters. There is ONLY exploitation.
They are painfully aware that when the Soviet Empire’s people realize that THEY were being exploited and shot by the Communists, the whole thing collapsed. You would think that the hungry, terrorized people under the Reds would have realized that, but they had to wait for a sign of the State weakening before the balloon exploded.
Leftists did not realize it was balloon. That explosion is not forgotten. You would think whites would long since have realized they are set up for extermination, but that is what respectable conservatives are for. When it comes to exterminating whites by “assimilation” conservatives are in perfect Solidarity with their liberal icons.
Leftists said that the Mantra “sickened” them because it was exploiters claiming to be victims. But they did not challenge its truth. Exploiters are to be destroyed. Non-whites cannot be racists. Therefore whites must be destroyed. Their argument is their admission.
But to True Believers who are still deaf from the last explosion, the Mantra is a danger sign. You will see regular features in the media about the fall of Fascist Italy or Nazi Germany, but you NEVER see anything about the relatively recent collapse of the larger Soviet Empire. That is because there is nothing in it for the left.
But don’t mistake the media’s ignoring that catastrophe for their not remembering it. They are still half deaf from the explosion they had no idea was coming. Any group which shouts Genocide is too much like the suppressed but vocal samizdat in the USSR that pointed out the terror and need their so-called Liberated People lived under.
When they hear the Mantra, their pants are never quite dry again.
---------Going Over the Mantra
Posted by Bob on February 1, 2010 at 7:14 am
Filed Under Coaching Session, Comment Responses | 11 Comments
AFRICA FOR THE AFRICANS, ASIA FOR THE ASIANS, WHITE COUNTRIES FOR EVERYBODY!
I slip sometimes. I thought of a bumper sticker like “Isn’t there enough room on earth for ONE Denmark?” It was the question why there is no room on earth for a white culture. Shari replied, “A bumper sticker should be “AFRICA FOR THE AFRICANS, ASIA FOR THE ASIANS, WHITE COUNTRIES FOR EVERYBODY!”
After all my preaching about staying with the Mantra, I had wandered myself. But I now have people to correct me.
I think the reason I capitalized those words was because it took me YEARS to add them on. I had been saying AFRICA FOR THE AFRICANS, ASIA FOR THE ASIANS, WHITE COUNTRIES FOR EVERYBODY! for years, and I had been reciting the mantra for years, but I had not put them together. Now I realize that those words summarize the Mantra. I am angry at myself for taking so long to put the two together.
It took me many years to develop the Mantra, and I am hesitant to discuss other people’s versions. So I will go through it, line by line, and try to explain why each line is there.
This very hard, because the words were developed slowly, in debate after debate. Each sentence is designed to keep the puppy’s nose in the poo.
I have been exposed to an awesome number of attempts by the anti-white puppy to get his nose out of said poo but I can’t remember most or all of them. All I know is that the Mantra would be shorter if I could do without a line of it.
When people tell me something will work and tell me the logic I don’t want to SAY that the words I have provided were not developed in my head, but in many, many hours of successful debate. If you haven’t been through all that, you would assume that sane people would get the point without repeating it.
But that is where you trip yourself up. We are not only not dealing with sane people, we are dealing with the most difficult form of insanity, one to which it cannot even occur that it considers itself to be the epitome of mental health.
That is why it took so long to develop what looks, after one has grasped it, to be an obvious truth. We are back to the Semmelweis Rule: Nothing is harder to get across than a simple reality that is being MILITANTLY overlooked.
---------AFRICA FOR THE AFRICANS, ASIA FOR THE ASIANS, WHITE COUNTRIES FOR EVERYBODY!
“It is said that there is this RACE problem. They say this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.”
“The Netherlands and Belgium are as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.”
“Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.”
“What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY Black Country and ONLY into black countries?”
“How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem? I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?”
“And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?”“But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am ANAZIWHOWANTSTOKILLSIXMILLIONJEWS.”
They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.
“ANTI-RACIST IS A CODE WORD FOR ANTI-WHITE.”
“Experts” Chase Their Own Asses
Posted by Bob on February 1, 2010 at 6:45 am
Filed Under Coaching Session | 4 Comments
The economic crash we are living with is a repetition of the one Japan had some years ago. The crash and part of the underlying conditions came from trusting the wrong people.
PLEASE don’t send a flood of your economic opinions unless they have to do with OUR subject. Our economic bureaucracy is a great deal like our academic bureaucracy. People put on coats and ties, went to the right lunches, stated the proper opinions, and after a certain number of years they seniored their way up the ladder to Financial Experts.
The same thing happened when Republicans gave the presidential nomination to Bob Dole, “because it was his turn.” Academic advancement has nothing to do with truth, futurology has nothing to do with the actual future, and economic trust has nothing to do with whether the guy with the coat and tie is accomplishing anything. If you choose your experts by anything but results, you get bad results.
Please note that, besides those who actually went to prison, no financial expert will cease to be a highly-paid financial expert because he helped cause a major national catastrophe. The actual result is to increase their exposure and income. In a financial crisis you call in recognized experts.
I predicted the same result on 9-11 when people were screaming about the criminal negligence in national security that caused that problem. I pointed out calmly that no one would-be fired, no one would be demoted, not one of the thousands, no one would even be criticized. As always people thought I was nuts.
Actually what people remember is not that I was right, but that I was nuts. Just as an experts who cause a crisis benefit from it, all people remember about me is that every time anything happens I say something ridiculous.
This is the same general impression the term “expert” is based on. People do not remember I was RIGHT. They only remember I was outrageous.
In our society, there is no benefit in being right unless you run your OWN small business. In that case the results count. But if you give EXPERT opinion, you get paid for fitting in.
One illustration of the reason experts have to be consistently wrong is how one set of experts cannot lose by causing a disaster, but they can lose by contradicting another set of professional experts. ONE of the reasons — please note I keep using that phrase — that the response to a terrorist act by a consistently ethnic set of terrorists is to strip search white grandmothers is that doing anything else would put the terrorists experts in conflict with the civil rights experts.
And LEGAL experts in general. The reason the public goes to planes with their shoes off and their pants dragging the floor is that a terrorist expert can do anything he wants to to the general public. But he cannot allow people to have their own weapons because low self-esteem types with costumes have that monopoly, because shirttail Napoleons with resplendent costumes at the top of the police bureaucracy want to be the only ones who control guns.
All the bureaucracies are happiest when protecting the public is left to experts only, while Americans cower in the corner with British fathers while burglars come in and rob with the family at home.
At the bottom of all this is our inability to be OUTRAGED. Before the Obedient Generation, Americans would not have put up with it.
In a sort of vague, brain-damaged way, Americans are beginning to mumble into their drool that outrage is missing, hence the Tea Party Movement. But this is light years away from the real problem. Nobody is more careful than those who are suddenly in the limelight as Tea Party Spokesmen to avoid saying anything that would lose them their new and only chance at fame. They want to become media EXPERTS on the Tea Party Movement, like respectable conservatives who are EXPERTS on opposing the left.
And so it goes on.
Experts chase their own asses in a circle, and we pay them and praise them for it.
---------Does “Non-Racist” Mean Non-Anything Else?
Posted by Bob on January 31, 2010 at 7:20 am
Filed Under Coaching Session | 8 Comments
Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white. Conservatives insist they are anti-racist, but everything they get paid to bitch about is a direct result of that anti-white program.
The most basic drive is not money and it is not power and it is not being a Tough Guy from World Wart II. Every drunk will shout to you that money is everything. I have listened to people tell me for fifty years that their heroism is everything.
But the only REAL imperative is producing offspring that look like oneself. Long before World War II billions of animals gave their lives to save their group. Every social animal will make sacrifices so that their GROUP will live and go on.
What does it do to a social animal if there is a massive social engineering program to cut out this instinct?
Of course no one likes to call the drive to convince whites to do themselves in “social engineering.” But what else COULD you call it? No one else calls it that because the very term exposes the problem. The term “social engineering” is not popular because it brings up the question of what ELSE is affected.
Any time you use the term “social engineering” it strips naked the POWER question involved. Anti-whites hide behind the mantel of Idealism. But ALL social engineering sees itself as idealistic.
The term is unpopular because people immediately ask:
1) “Who does this give power to?”
2) Who decides what is good for us? And
3) If you interfere with people’s instincts in one area, what affect does this have on the rest of their minds?
None of these questions arises in regard to anti-whites.
Not only is getting rid of whites social engineering, it is social engineering on the most basic instinct of all.
Every social animal protects its borders. But we cannot protect our borders because there is no we. It becomes a random selection of Hispanics being kept out by a random selection of Hispanics in the border patrol. We do not have what every other social animals has had for a hundred million years: a gene pool to be protected.
Secondly, every nation is an accumulation of its individuals, as in we the people of the United States of America and OUR posterity. The Constitution no longer holds. You simply cannot have a multiracial, multicultural state and refer to ourselves and OUR posterity at the same time. We have gone from a contract where people give up certain powers to a propositional state.
In a propositional state, all power goes to whoever INTERPRETS the Proposition. The Judiciary is to be obeyed by all, because it has taken the place of the balance of powers. The President could say in his oath of office, “I swear to uphold and defend the latest opinion of a majority of the Supreme Court.” That is what he does. The old document is not what he upholds and defends.
All of this flows naturally from anti-white social engineering. Conservatives bitch about the symptoms but they shriek at all heretics and demand the right to lead the lynch mob.
---------WHERE?
Posted by Bob on January 30, 2010 at 6:52 am
Filed Under Coaching Session, Comment Responses | 3 Comments
This may be a problem only for me, since I was not raised in the computer age and simply don’t have the energy any more to do real search.
I know our commenters look for our ideas reflected in other locations because you are constantly sending me links. But for Old Bob, these links fall into two categories:
1) Place where the Mantra Thinking has been cut out; and
2) Places where I can’t FIND the section referred to.
The first one demonstrates as nothing else could my point about respectable conservatism. Right-wing blogs which are not specifically pro-white will remove whole pages to get rid of the Mantra and show they are not doing just that. That happens all the time.
But there are pages which are still there and a commenter gives the link only. But no such pages are devoted only and entirely to the one comment referred to. Is it the Mantra which we might look for or is a use of the Mantra? I don’t know about you, but I would have to read fifty entries to find what has been referred to, and even then it could have been removed AND the commenter was not specific about what I am looking for.
Since this is very important to us, commenters will have to be far, far more specific about how to find them than just giving a link.
Brian has trouble with this link-only business. But he has a solution.
It’s called copy and paste.
When Brian gives me a link, he COPIES the specific thing he is referring to. That takes a few seconds. Then he puts in the words he is referring to and THEN puts the link below it. I want the quote itself, and there is no reason in our age for me to have to look it up. But I also want the CONTEXT, what is the nature of the blog or other place where this is quoted?
Giving only a link is OUTDATED, like referring to a tome.
This is easy, and it would put an end to our present endless frustration.
---------A Note to My Fellow Evil Conspirators
Posted by Bob on January 29, 2010 at 4:57 am
Filed Under Coaching Session | 9 Comments
One of the things that is totally different with BUGS is that we look for our ideas in OTHER BLOGS.
Everybody else looks fore the growth of their OWN audience, their OWN membership. I don’t think there is another group that does what we do: Look for the spread of our IDEAS. This is so unique that I only noticed it today.
Stop and think about this. Someday it is going to be absolutely impossible for people to think this just happened. It had to be planned.
It gives us a lesson in what drives people to think in terms of conspiracies. ONE lesson here is that people think of the other side as evil, and that they do not do things simply because they honestly feel that way. The reason we plant ideas without so much regard for our own expansion or recognition is obvious to US.
We are honestly only interested in what we have to say and planting our Mantra Thinking because we are actually only interested in the only thing nature is interested in, insuring that future generations look like us. This is absolutely impossible for others to believe.
But that is not the way those who oppose us think of us. We have an ulterior motive, so any success we are having cannot be because that is ALL we want. We did this successful thing because we had an Ulterior Motive. If you think that way, and that is the way people DO think, anything we do that turns out to be a success has some other motivation.
Some commenters have talked about how some of us might be successful in the future. Those will be looked upon as having gained their positions not because they simply have a way of thinking that made sense, but because they planned it that way.
No one wants to think we came up with something that was so obvious and they and their heroes were so busy doing the old thing that they sunk into oblivion because they were unoriginal and BORING. They will insist that their side was always right, not just mentally static.
If they look at us as we are, we deserve a lot of credit, but that is because realized they were ridiculous.
Damned few people are willing to admit in retrospect that they were just plain SILLY.
In order to avoid that conclusion they have to raise themselves and their own brilliance. In order to do that they have to raise US to the level of prophetic geniuses. That is why all Conspirators end up as all-powerful and superhuman. Whatever else you may say of the Learned Elders of Zion, you must admit it raises Jewish leaders to a level of all-seeing genius.
That is why I was so impressed by the fellow on Ventura’s show who said, “They’re smarter than we are.” He did not say it in an admiring way as conspiracy theorists or respectable conservatives do. He was simply saying that they were smarter than those who simply didn’t SEE it.
Respectable conservatives are that way. They cannot admit that conservatives have been a bunch of approval-starved morons. So they see leftists as the epitome of sophistication who are EVEN SMARTER than that Great Sophisticate William Buckley.
Conspiracy theorists will not admit that they are saps, but they also cannot give the other side credit for sincerely believing in what they say. So they explain it all not only by the Power and Genius of the other side, but also by their Evil: “We’re not dumb. We just lost because we’re Good and True and therefore Trustful.”
So they cannot learn from their mistakes. Their only weakness comes from their devotion to Good.
No one who thinks that way can ever learn simple basics.
---------The Filter Down Effect
Posted by Bob on January 28, 2010 at 5:41 am
Filed Under Coaching Session | 2 Comments
Filter Down has always been accepted in all societies. Newly discovered ideas and techniques take a while to be accepted by the general population. Ideologues who refer to themselves as Idealists say that their progressive concepts have not yet “gotten accepted.”
This was legitimate in earlier times. In earlier societies basic knowledge remained fairly static, so the only dynamic was the filter down of the different TAKE on people’s knowledge and world view. But now we have a dynamic which is even more rapid than the fastest filter-down process. Today our view of reality itself changes far faster than the analysis of OLD world views filter down.
Marxism has filtered down into Political Correctness. But Marxism is a set of ideas derived from Kantian dialectics and, far more so, from the realities accepted in the mid-nineteenth century. Marx assumed that only human beings had institutions. Everyone in his time knew that only man had borders.
Marx assumed that only men had inequality. Marxism did not move a whit from those positions. Political Correctness is based on them today. Lysenko took over Soviet agriculture insisting that genetics was not important.
Today the Missing Frontal Lobes (MFLs) on our side get paid to debate the Communist fairy tale as if it were a serious point of view. If they took the Flat Earth Society that seriously, they would probably be institutionalized.
You will never get rid of this outdated crappola by taking it seriously. To coin a phrase:
When I was a child I thought as a child.
Now it is time to put away childish ways.
---------Repetition and Reward
Posted by Bob on January 27, 2010 at 6:52 am
Filed Under Coaching Session | 8 Comments
One of the lessons of BUGS is REPETITION. We were being beaten by human tape recorders, and we made fun of them. We enjoyed the ego boost so much we didn’t ANALYZE why those tape recorders were beating people with functioning frontal lobes.
We answered this mindlessness by putting out tomes.
Once again, you have to ask “Why is this information being PRODUCED?” The tomes were produced largely for ego. Those who wrote and read them felt superior. Those like me who gave them simple, Occam’s Razor analyses were, in some way, insulting them. This is the Semmelweis Effect.
You can look up Semmelweis or other things I mention in our excellent Search blank on the right side. To sum up, Ignac Semmelweis found in the mid-nineteenth century that women were dying in doctors’ hospitals after childbirth because doctors were going straight from dissection to delivering babies.
Doctors had all sorts of explanations for this death rate, including the one we considered most advanced: psychosomatic symptoms. Semmelweis died in a madhouse because he could not convince them that the cause was so uninspiring.
In other words, doctors kept killing mothers and babies because the solution hurt their EGOS.
Liberals presented themselves as Great Intellectuals and respectable conservatives like Buckley groveled at their feet, as they do today, and put out untranslated French quotes and fake accents.. And that , boys and girls, is the entire history of the last fifty years in America.
It is time we stop messaging our egos and started WINNING. Hence the Mantra.
Besides repetition, another thing the winners on the other side are criticized for is their takeover of foundations and paying organizations of every kind. As one rightist said, “Anything in our society that is not specifically conservative becomes a liberal front, land some of our groups do too.”
My boss John Ashbrook, was a pale conservative if there ever was one, but the John Ashbrook Foundation is totally neoconservative property.
Now the EGO analysis of this is “Them Bad, Us Good,” but translated into French to soothe our egos.
My analysis is that THEY are doing something right and we are, as usual, kidding ourselves that we are anything but LOSERS if we don’t see that.
I won’t be here forever, so I want to leave a legacy not only of the virtues of repetition but also of the virtues of REWARD. The Holocaust industry is an INDUSTRY. It pays people to push it.
Therefore it will never die.
On the other hand, if you leave behind a tradition of sacrifice, sacrifice, and nothing but sacrifice. One leader, when he was asked if anyone could succeed him, he said something seen by many as pure genius: “Yes, but they are all dead.”
This is usually quoted to show what a Great and Unique Man he was.
To me this is the ultimate failure. It is nothing to be proud of if you leave no intellectual heirs. But if you think only in terms of eternal sacrifice and how idealistic you yourself are, you will not leave any heirs. You concentrate on your own ego, and you get your own ego.
Congratulations and welcome to the Dead and Sterile World this kind of thinking leads to.
This is why I keep emphasizing that when our reaction comes, we must build a FOUNDATION with it, and lots of foundations. It is not out of revenge I want us to have a rewards system looking into the present holocaust against whites. I have simply observed what WORKS.
We should have people PAID to root our ads and support for genocide. There is a VAST source of money in it, and we should exploit it. The superrich and their heirs, the huge companies that sponsor quiet encouragement of interracial coupling in their ads, these represent hundreds of billions if no trillions of dollars.
Stalinist murderers can brag about it. A kid who was fourteen conscripted by the SS to work as a guard is hounded the rest of his life. I want THEM hounded. I want what I am living through to be REMEMBERED.
And the only way the lesson will be remembered, as we have been shown, is to REWARD those who REMEMBER it.
This is not revenge with me, thought God knows those who are committing genocide deserve all they get. But this is a PRACTICAL matter.
Look around you. LOOK at the RESULTS of those who never ask for revenge against Communists and those who PAY for revenge against Nazis. Look at the Che Guevara t-shirts and for ONE, for God’s sake, let’s show a little less foaming resentment and a little more ANALYSIS.
I am not in this to leave a reputation as a genius, as so many seem to be. After I die a billion dollar memorial will do me no good. I have fought my whole life for something and my one concern is that it will go the way of the geniuses who single wish is that be called irreplaceable.
The Semmelweis Lesson: if it saves life, concentrate on washing your hands. The Whitaker Corollary: Be sure that in future people will get revenge that PAYS.
---------The Double Defense
Posted by Bob on January 26, 2010 at 6:55 am
Filed Under Coaching Session | 12 Comments
Long before Orwell wrote 1984 there was a standard joke among lawyers about the Double Defense.
The Double Defense says that 1) “MY client didn’t do it and we have witnesses to prove he was elsewhere at the time of the crime” and “We also have witnesses who were at the scene who will testify that he was justified in doing it.”
Actually, some version of the Double Defense has been successfully used, but of course the lawyers consider any jury that would even consider such a defense a bunch of morons.
That is correct.
Imagine my reaction when our people routinely accept a Double Defense.
This Double Defense comes up all the time. Anti-whites say 1) we are NOT committing genocide and 2) Genocide is justifiable. Just how smart does that make US?
But I see this Double Defense in SF All The Time. The anti-whites go straight from denying genocide to repeating Mommy Professor’s Evil White Man stuff. So do any of our Ego Trip pro-whites simply point out that they are JUSTIFYING what they are DENYING?
Nossir. when the witness declares he didn’t do it and then goes on to say he is doing it for a REASON, Old Missing Frontal Lobe trails right along, arguing crime rates and colonization. They want to show how much they know, so it never occurs to them to put aside all their tome information and look at what the OTHER idiot, the one on the other side, just said.
It makes you tired, very, very tired.
---------BUGS and the Internet Age
Posted by Bob on January 25, 2010 at 6:53 am
Filed Under Coaching Session | 4 Comments
Brian sent me a link where a man who was a literature major has found that his whole mentality has been altered by the Internet. Where he once proudly treasure huge tomes, he is now impatient if a person can’t get to the point in a couple of paragraphs.
I keep repeating that you must always ask WHY a piece of information has been produced. In this case it is a matter of HOW it is produced.
IN order to say ANYTHING publicly, you used to get a maximum of one shot. Most didn’t get that.
You had to get name recognition, you had to get published. And when you got published you had to anticipate what the questions would be,.
Once again, using the Semmelweis Rule, the explanation of this is so simple it does not inflate the ego. What has happened is that the dam on information has been breached. It used to be a matter of slowly digging your way through the publication process or being accepted by one of the major networks. The process was very cumbersome.
Now you can simply say what you have to say and answer objections on the Internet the next day. You can hit people with an idea without being a respectable Buckley persona for the networks waiting months for the reviews.
So the heavy duty reading that went with the cumbersome old methods are as out of date as etching on stone.
In the new age you have to know what you are doing to say and SAY it.
More important, your reputation today is as a New York Intellectual will not make people read another whole book by you when they can hear others who simply have something to say and say it quickly.
If this method does not sound familiar to you you haven’t been reading BUGS long.
---------Genocide is Not Just Immigration
Posted by Bob on January 24, 2010 at 7:02 am
Filed Under Coaching Session | 8 Comments
My commenters have internalized rules it took me years to formulate. One of these is that if what you are saying goes down too easily with anti-whites, you need to think about it.
Lord Nelson impressed me when he changed his line from white genocide, to the West being overrun. He didn’t realize he has changed it. He was reacting to the simple fact that the path of least resistance allies to the mind as well as physics. He suddenly found this was very easy to sell to anti-whites, and didn’t think over WHY.
Let me hasten to add that THE INSTANT I pointed this out, he saw what I meant and went back to the harder line.
A lot of readers won’t understand what the hard line is.
If you use the term “overwhelm” you are just one of the anti-immigration types.
We already have more than enough non-whites to do away with the race already inside our borders and they are multiplying like rabbits.
The only problem anti-immigration types have with non-whites here is that they refuse to have intercourse with their daughters. They “refuse to assimilate.”
That is NOT our problem.
Attacking immigration makes you a respectable conservative. Opposing interracial marriage or bastardization is “Hitlerism.”
It is also Jeffersonianism, but if you go onto the path of least resistance you won’t think of that.
---------Uniformity
Posted by Bob on January 23, 2010 at 9:17 am
Filed Under Coaching Session | 3 Comments
Dave’s observation about my war on the costume fetish did what I read comments for, to maker me think. A free person is paranoid about anything that separates the people from Government. Nothing does that like a uniform.
My fate is to be decided by twelve of my peers and a god. I can do without the god, thank you.
What the hell is a judge doing in DRESS? This is a guy who is deciding life and death and he is dressing like a Superhero! NOBODY in a court of law should think of himself as more than a man.
And it is the nature of the human animal that what he wears affects his judgment. In European countries which were totalitarian and theocratic throughout their histories, there are only judges in their robes and little hats. The JURY is a purely Anglo-Saxon artifact. It was probably an expression of Britain’s loss of faith in its own people when judges and lawyers put on wigs.
Free people have a different relationship with those who govern them, one inn which costumes have no role. Try to imagine how the Founding Fathers would have reacted to Presidential Robes.
The Commander in Chief has no uniform.
In the fifteenth century most monarchs tried hard to keep all arms in the hands of nobles and soldiers. As with the jury system, England was a WILD exception. It is the only country I know of that ever punished PEASANTS for NOT having weapons!
It wasn’t much of a punishment, but after Crecy England’s military might depended on the longbow. That n turn depended on one’s having a longbow and practicing with it. It takes time and effort, and as more and more forms of amusement came along, fewer and fewer English peasants stuck to it.
A bowling lane has ten pins today because “nine pins” became so popular it was taking the peasants away from archery practice. They added a pin to make it legal.
But behind that little story is a bigger one. The kind and Parliament were actually trying to FORCE peasants to own and become expert with a weapon that killed armored knights. This was not the kind of thinking that was any more usual then than it is in Europe or blue states today.
What did the kings and the nobles really depend on in England? They lived and died by POLITICS. As I said, politics is life. The depended on their own popularity so completely that they tried to FORCE the people to have weapons that could kill them.
For obvious reasons you’ll have to wait a long time before any Mommy Professor mentions this historical oddity.
---------Have-Nots Hate Haves
Posted by Bob on January 22, 2010 at 5:51 am
Filed Under Coaching Session | 7 Comments
People without money will tell you that everybody’s motivated by money. If you want financial advice, go to a bar, sit down by the guy who is nursing the only drink he can afford, buy him more, and listen.
He will tell you how to make money. He will tell you the characteristics of people who make money. He will explain to you that making money is behind everything on earth. Money, he will explain, is the Objective Purpose of everything.
Someone WITH money, as they slide into their cups, will explain to you all about Power. They HAVE money, so it holds no ambition for them. In fact the main way someone like me got enough money to live on was being paid by rich folks who wanted power.
A person without money tends to believe that everybody is after what he is after, money. People who have money, he feels, are the bad ones.
A rich person in America does not have the power he feels he should have. People who have power, he insists, are the bad ones.
Uglies tend to believe the Beautiful People are just AWFUL.
If you do not have a white skin, it is easy to convince you that whites are terrible.
Depressive Puritan types hate joyful people, hoping they are damned.
The list is endless.
This goes along with the rule that those who hate are constantly condemning Hate, those who are merciless love abstract Mercy. The real explanation of this is quite simple. A person thinks about what he thinks about most. A billionaire does not think about money all that much. In fact, real luxury means that you don’t have to think about money at all: “If you have to ask the price you can’t afford it.”
BUGS is dedicated to straight, simple explanations like this. People who get PAID to be pundits do not think in my terms for a very simple reason. It is one reason respectable conservatives are the only professional commentators. If you hit a Politically Correct person with my kind of argument, the discussion is over.
They are getting laughed at.
Then it’s Dead Air. And Dead Air is death to talk programs.
So only a respectable conservative can keep the media commenters going.
Those who think about hate a lot capitalize it. They think that Hate explains human action. Those who think about money a lot think of money as the basis of all human motivation. Likewise Power. Likewise Mercy.
Paid pundits hate this kind of thinking for an equally simple reason. They get to paid to drag it out, to fill time and fill space on the printed page.
Hence the following verse, which once would have been called doggerel but now is referred to as the Art of Rap:
A NICKLE A WORD
In most magazines there’s always a place
For people with talent for filling up space.
That’s why they pay me a nickel a syllable
For filling up space that still remain fillable.
The things I say may not make sense
And seem to you absurd
For it’s not logic that I need
But words and words and words and words
And words and words and words.
Politics is life
Posted by Bob on January 21, 2010 at 3:50 pm
Filed Under Coaching Session | 4 Comments
Six months is a long time in what the pundits call politics. The 2010 elections look awful for the Democrats, with four consecutive defeats since the 2008 victory. But for me, that is not politics.
This sounds strange, since that was the sort of analysis I made my living on. To me, “politics” is a very, VERY long-term business. “Politics,” said the Greeks, “is life.”
“Politics is life.” There have been endless Wise Discussions on what those words meant. All of the famous ones begin at the same point: a total disinterest in what THE GREEKS meant by it. Likewise all popular theological discussion begins at a common point: a complete in what JESUS THE MAN meant in his own time.
Oddly enough there is nothing wrong with this. As I have said, Futurology has nothing whatsoever to do with the future. Likewise no interpretation of Jesus’ words has anything to do with understanding HIM. Futurology, like theology, lives or dies on its ability to interest people NOW and to get donations NOW.
Futurology is no more correct that Flash Rogers was, but it gets hundreds of millions of dollars each year and support thousands of people who call themselves Experts on the Future. Likewise Vatican II declared a huge number of things that Vatican I SPECIFICALLY determined to be heretical.
Since futurology has nothing to do with the future, and Christian Theology has little to do with Christ, it is no surprise that pundits have almost nothing to do with politics.
“Politics is life.” Well, most people realize that whether Mo is favored over Larry six months before the election constitutes “life.” Though in my myriad political campaigns I have seen exceptions to that rule, people whose whole life really is Mo’s percentage in a poll or whether one black basketball team beasts another, both teams more or less randomly selected from the same national pool.
But most people. If sober, will not insist that whether Sara Palin is ahead in the polls is a matter of life or death.
Politics is what we discuss here. “Politics is life” goes back to the real basis of life. The basis of life has always been very simple: Will the next generation look like YOU? The Greek’s life was the polis, whose life was determined by his definition of politics. The wolf lives and dies by his pack. Greeks survived or died with their polis.
One of the major steps forward in studying evolution was the inclusion into it of politics. Before that it was assumed that heroism was a purely human trait because mere animals only wanted survival for THEMSELVES: “Nature red in blood and claw.” No valor among animals.
Wrong. Higher animals almost universally survive in groups. To survive one must preserve one’s group. In African Genesis Robert Ardrey introduced us to animals who sacrificed themselves in ways that fulfill even the Obedient Generation’s claims for itself.
But heroism is necessary only where politics has FAILED. The baboon must throw itself to the wild dogs so its brethren have time to get to safety ONLY if the troop leadership FAILED and left the group in danger, The failure of political leadership becomes necessary makes death necessary on SOMEBODY’S part, in the group or among the heroes.
If we who practice REAL politics succeed, the race can live without the battle causing death.
Politics is life.
---------Et Tu, Bay State?
Posted by Bob on January 20, 2010 at 7:38 am
Filed Under Coaching Session, Politics | 9 Comments
In 2008 the Democrats finally elected their kind of President. Kennedy was the last Democratic president from outside the Old Confederacy. Roosevelt was the last non-Southern Democrat to get a majority of the vote.
The reason for this was because the Democratic Convention kept nominating Hubert Humphrey and Massachusetts Democrats and McGoverns the country rejected. Finally the combination of George W’s Vietnam PLUS recession and the threat of “racism” that got Christopher Buckley’s endorsement, they won.
But the bottom line is that America finally got what the Democratic Convention had been trying to sell for two generations.
The Democrats remind me of a dog who keeps bringing dead animals to his master and can’t understand the cool reception they get.
When a hard-core liberal push gets defeated in MASSACHUSETTS, something’s WRONG.
What is wrong is probably the obvious point that Democrats have been blind to for many decades: Americans do not want what they desire.
Period.
It’s a classical problem: they’re too far left. Ho-hum.
Actually the Democrats have the same blindness Republicans do. Both were caught with their pants down when Reagan won in 1980 and Gingrich won in 1994. The congress of 1994 promptly began back-peddling to “the votes are in the middle of the road.”
In short, nothing is happening that we are not familiar with. National commentators, right and left, are always taken completely by shock when the obvious happens. They can’t see reality. They get PAID, on BOTH sides, NOT to see reality.
Those who believe in conspiracies have a touching faith in the good sense of those who wind up in power. A guy who can make money must be a genius in all things, so they can’t make all those mistakes without MEANING to.
If you spent as much time as I have near those with money and power, trying to make them see the simplest realities, the whole conspiracy bit makes you laugh. Yes, they ARE that stupid.
The geniuses who rule the left have one thing in common with Mommy Professor: they have the same basic premise as the conspiracy theorists have: that they are enormously intelligent. Mommy Professor is hopeless because he honestly believes he is an idealist and a genius.
One how thinks he is an idealist is immune to any feeling of loyalty or any pangs of conscience. One who thinks he knows all is incapable of learning. This is the picture Mommy Professor has of himself and this is the picture the superrich have of themselves.
They are absolutely incapable of seeing the obvious.
They have no way of LEARNING the obvious because anyone who points it out to them is considered simplistic. A genius has no use for a simplist.
What happened in Massachusetts is that the Democratic Convention FINALLY got what it want. They elected a black McGovern.
Only a conspiracy theorist could make that mysterious.
---------Reality Comes to TV
Posted by Bob on January 19, 2010 at 5:38 am
Filed Under Coaching Session | 4 Comments
Reality Television has had an interesting by-product.
In my day Outside Reality came to us in the form of CNS, NBC, ABC and, for the fully brainwashed, PBS. Movies showed us that an American in a crisis was a panicking hunk of jelly until the guys in costumes and the College educated sophisticate came along.
On TV and in the movies, we were the aliens. No plot ever blamed Moscow. The movie always showed, and shows. The idea that Communists do something wrong as a cover for right wing evil, perpetrated by white Americans.
I have to switch away from Twilight Zone replays when they show something Southern, because it always shows that all blacks accused of crime are not only innocent but saints.
Reality TV is dangerous because it shows reality. The average American seldom goes to pieces in an emergency. Homeland Security can’t stop a terrorist but his fellow passengers could. But the media, including FOX, didn’t want to dwell on the implications of that. If the regular media worship regular bureaucrats, conservatives worship the ones in costume, and neither wants average Americans to get uppity.
Leftism and respectable conservatism is a team effort.
On Twilight Zone TV blacks are all saints. Watching Reality TV you are surprised, EVEN IN ALASKA, if the repeat criminal they catch is white.
As I have said, people got a bit tired of watching grown men scream and panic in regular TV whenever the villain shows up and The Authorities aren’t there. The official line of the media, including the good old respectable, was you should give the criminal everything he wanted. If he was raping your daughter, if was OK to scream, but better to keep smiling at him.
It is like the first reaction to that latest terrorist his fellow passengers took down. It was not to treat Americans less like a prison population, but to forbid them going to the bathroom within an hour of landing.
FINALLY, at LONG last, the reaction was an unbelieving laugh and some RESENTMENT for a change.
On very rare occasions he regular media might have to report a foiled robbery, but they ALWAYS said the resister “risked his life and that of others.” BAD boy!
Raised in that uniforms-are-everything Obedience Generation environment, it is hard for me to believe that I am seeing “American Fight Back” stuff. It is real breakthrough, but only I am going to point it out to you.
---------WHOSE Objectivity?
Posted by Bob on January 18, 2010 at 1:27 pm
Filed Under Coaching Session, Political Correctness | 2 Comments
When someone demands objectivity, always ask, “WHOSE objectivity?” When they are questioned on such matter as their fanaticism for Obama or their unanimous screams against Goldwater they will shrug and say objectivity is not possible in the real world. Then they start declaring that all objective science is agreed on global warning and especially race.
All tyranny is based on objectivity. Ayn Rand said that Freedom is based philosophy of Objectivism. Her followers are as rigid and as mirthless as any Puritan. Cotton Mather, Karl Marx, CS Lewis, Ayn Rand, all of them see spontaneous joy as evil, as an enemy of the grim Objectivity they are trying to promote.
In his Surprised by Joy, Lewis hurried to point out that his Joy was not a happy emotion.
I have written repeatedly that the person who calls everybody a liar in invariably a liar himself, that those who shout Mercy loudest uses it as an excuse for unlimited torture, that the person who scream HATE is always motivated by hatred himself, and that an experienced cop will look twice at anyone who is trying to look TOO innocent.
Mercy is the opposite of mercy, all capitalized virtues are their historical opposites.
Objectivity is the antithesis of freedom in history. And Freedom is the opposite of freedom because Freedom is objective. That is why it is capitalized. Actual freedom exists precisely to the extent that Objective Judgment stops limiting it.
Wordism says Freedom is a matter of WHO limits it. One is Truly Free only if he is obeying he law or the Lord or Marx or Mommy Professor.
And that, brothers and sisters, is ALL that the word freedom means.
Because of what freedom really is, a free person must always regard EVERY form of judgment as an imposition. Tyranny has absolutely nothing to do with the Words which lead to limiting it. BY its very name, society must limit freedom. But one must never look upon one excuse, one form of Wordism, as better than another.
I once called cop in Britain because a loudmouth was sitting on his roof next to my hotel. When the cop showed he ran. The cop told me he couldn’t do anything anyway, because in Britain a man’s home was his castle. I asked him what about he Englishman n his hotel room trying to sleep. One cannot throw rocks from his castle so why can he throw noise?
Nobody ever answers me.
And what about my right to go straighten the guy out myself. That I didn’t bring up before a cop, but it is freedom any Anglo-Saxon would have recognized.
None of my freedoms mattered because the man in front of me had on a costume. He represented Objectivity.
The loudmouth’s freedoms have to be weighed against mine. That is true and it is what people say. But my point here is that, as usual, they say it but they don’t THINK about it.
My point is that the BALANCE is the point, not the JUSTIFICATION. In Rule WW2 I pointed out that the media or a respectable conservative cannot say that shooting someone down for trying to escape a Red country is not the same thing as a right-winger shooting someone down. If that were evil the entire Communist Empire would be evil., OBVIOUSLY evil from the word go.
But this cannot be because the left cannot be evil, just as Jews cannot hate and only whites can be racists.
No human being is objective or perfect in any other way. But the inability to be altogether good is no excuse for evil and the imperfection at being objective is not a license not to be. But Wordists use their Truth as an excuse, whether it is their version of Patriotism or Mommy Professor’s Progressivism or the million different declaration of the Will of the Lord.
Wordism sees no such balance.
Wordism is insane.
---------Rule WW2
Posted by Bob on January 17, 2010 at 2:16 pm
Filed Under Coaching Session | 7 Comments
In Red Dawn a Cuban asks the Patrick Swayze character why he thinks his Wolverines have a right to fight the invading Soviets. The Wolverines reacted in a very realistic way.
First, he is comp-lately chocked by the question, it seems so stupid. Then he says, “Because we LIVE here!” The main reason the very low budget Red Dawn was such a hit and made Swayze an instant major star was because it reawoke images of an old American hero, grandma, sitting on the porch with a shotgun waiting for the county to come try to take over her house for a new highway.
Old Granny With a Shotgun was the American hero the World War II Generation disowned If the Government put them in costumes and orders they would not hesitate to kill the old bitch. She has the outdated American attitude “I LIVE here!”
The Greatest Generation, the Obedient Generation, would tell her, “Nothing is YOURS, Grandma. This is a government of laws not of men.”
And above all, they would say, “Grandma, this is for YOUR OWN GOOD.”
They went overseas and saved Stalin and gave one third of the world’s population to the Communists.
They Saved the World. The Reds in Red Dawn would certainly have agreed that that was true. But what did it do for US? Instead of having Communists and Fascists fighting each other, we ended up giving totalitarians the A-Bomb and a share of the world they never dreamed of until the US Saved the World for them.
We spent most of my life trying to contain the Communists and avoid a nuclear war. We sentient countries routinely on the idea that it was good for them. In fact, it was our unpopularity in those countries that the Reds fed on. The very people who would happily kill Grandmas for blocking the formation of a Collective Farm, which did kill millions of Kulak grannies, babushkas, for exactly that purpose, were the Wolverine line against us.
The justification was that we were keeping Communists from taking them over. But they hadn’t ASKED us to do that. And that was not the real justification for our interference in other countries. Our real justification was that Communism was dangerous to US. After the Obedience Generation gave a billion people to the Reds we were on the defensive.
But we had to talk in World War II terms. We had fought for the Reds. We really couldn’t say that we were fighting Communists because they were evil, evil like the Nazis. We had already thrown ourselves totally on their side against the Nazis as fellow fighters against Evil. We had allied with them and recognized them in the United Nations.
It was not until Reagan that any American president used the word “evil” to the Soviet Empire. The media blew sky high.
I can also tell you that, like “Mister Gorbeczev, tear down this wall,” Reagan had to reinsert that term Evil Empire REPEATEDLY because his staff kept taking it out of his own speech. People who were behind the Iron Curtain have said this was the speech that galvanized them, gave them HOPE.
Evil Empire and Gorbeczev tear down this wall are the two things that stand out in the history in the Reagan Administration, and his staff fought to take out BOTH of them. If Reagan had not been born in 1911, he probably would have gone along with them. But his mind had been set before the Obedience Generation took over.
Nobody else remembers grandma with her shotgun.
We could not denounce the Soviet Empire because the Obedience Generation thought just like them. As with the Mantra, this is a blind spot that is so deeply ingrained in our thinking that nobody SEES it. It is the rule that you have to be a right-winger to be EVIL.
Very few people wonder about why calling the Soviet Empire Evil was such a violation of the rules. Like the ongoing genocide against whites, they SEE it but they do not know it. Very few people on the left would hesitate to call every European Empire Evil.
But even the non-Communist American left screamed bloody murder, as did Reagan’s own staff, when he violated the World War II Rule that only the right can be called Evil.
If you see the World War II you can see why Stalin and Churchill were natural allies. The last imperialist British Prime Minister destroyed the Empire he loved just as Stalin built his. World War II decided that a left-wing empire was OK or just a little wrong, whereas a right-wing empire was Evil, just as a Leftist dictatorship was a bit too idealistic, whereas a left-wing dictatorship was the People’s Friend.
Like the Mantra, this rule as never stated publicly but everybody knew it. That’s why Reagan’s staff so desperately tried to keep him from violating this rule. That’s why everybody expected it when the media hit the roof when Reagan did that.
Churchill and Stalin thought exactly alike, and both of them thought like the post-WW2 US foreign policy. Churchill thought of his Empire, not as a prop for British power and pretensions, but as good for the natives, Kipling’s White Man’s Burden. Stalin and Bush and Johnson all justified their imperialism the same way.
You don’t have Vietnam Wars and Iraq Wars on the basis of US self-interest.
Just as the Inquisition hit new highs of torture in the name of Mercy and Communism set new highs of massacre and induced poverty in the name of peace, land and bread, modern imperialism always claims the good of the people it is interfering with.
And the man who says “Lie!” most is a liar.
And the man who screams “HATE!” loudest is a hater.
---------Bob’s Books
Bob's first book - 1976 
A PLAGUE ON BOTH YOUR HOUSES
Bob's second book - 1982 
THE NEW RIGHT PAPERS
Bob's deadliest book - 2004 
Why Johnny Can't Think
America's
Professor-Priesthood
-