Bob Whitaker's Weekly Articles  –  March 12, 2005

March 12, 2005  –  PC Jihad

March 12, 2005  –  Sissies On The Warpath

March 12, 2005  –  Desperate Respectables

March 12, 2005  –  The Friend of My Enemy Is My Enemy

Fun Quote:

If a person uses labels to make good sound evil, anyone who respects those labels will someday meet Satan up close and personal.


PC Jihad


Most of my readers know that I constantly repeat the point that Political Correctness is not LIKE a religion, it IS a religion.

Well, what sort of religion is it? It seems to me that it is a lot like Islam with its jihad. Why do I say that?

Islam teaches that everyone is either a Muslim or an infidel. Islam requires complete devotion. The term "secular Islam" makes about as much sense as "Judeo-Christian."

Political Correctness DEMANDS total obedience from everyone. There is no middle ground. Everyone is either Politically Correct or a "hater."

Islam recognizes no distinction among adherents, racial, ethnic, cultural, or otherwise. You either are a Muslim or you are an infidel. If you recognize any other distinction, you are not true to Islam.

Political Correctness recognizes no distinction among adherents, racial, ethnic, cultural, or otherwise. You either are Politically Correct or you are a hater. If you recognize any other distinction, you are a hater. Unless, of course, you are a non-white.

In spite of its bloody beginnings and history, we are told by the White House and the media that Islam is a religion of "peace."

In like manner, everyone who opposes the ABSOLUTE demands of Political Correctness is INTOLERANT. So Political Correctness is a religion of "tolerance" in the same way that Islam is a religion of "peace."

"Spiritual" jihad in Islam is the inner battle to rid oneself of anything that hinders one from perfect obedience to Islam. Physical jihad is the war to subdue and convert or destroy infidels.

"Spiritual" Political Correctness is the inner battle against recognizing any differences among people, against "institutional racism," "patriarchal vestiges," etc. Physical Political Correctness is the war to subdue and eliminate the white race.

Faithful Islamic young people must memorize and recite large passages of the Koran by rote. They do this to be deemed worthy adherents and gain the approval of the Imam.

Young people living under Political Correctness are expected to memorize and recite large amounts of leftist nonsense to be blessed by its priesthood with a diploma.


Sissies On The Warpath


The comparison between Political Correctness and Islam is not perfect. There are some differences. Obviously, the substance of both teachings is different. But the major difference is in their method of "jihad."

Mohammed began Islam by good, old-fashioned murder and pillage. You either joined him or went on to the next life. It was a gruesome, but successful formula.

Political Correctness does not take a direct, masculine approach. It is feminine in its approach. All sweetness and light on the surface, but ruthless in its behind the scenes manipulations.

A Mohammedan would meet you head-on with a sword. That was his argument.

A Politically Correct "warrior" is an oxymoron. One can't imagine such a being.

Anyone who has seen the machinations of a group of women who are at odds with one another has a glimpse of how the Politically Correct "fight."

It takes men to meet men in battle. It takes men to keep women from each other's throats.

It takes men to stop Political Correctness.


Desperate Respectables


Respectable Conservatives are like feminine, secular Muslims. They are an oxymoron. They like to talk big and look tough, but are whimpering cowards.

Respectables are like the Tom turkey I saw recently. He is a well-fed, domesticated pet. When spring approaches, he begins to puff up to show off his plumage to the non-existent female turkeys. He can't help himself.

He usually gets a special treat at feeding time, a few nuggets of dog food. But this time of year, when the tasty bits are thrown down, he starts to puff out his feathers before he can bend down to get the food. The chickens then swoop in to grab them.

When the time comes for someone to make a tough political stand, respectables puff up like Tom turkey to show off their "colors." They do this to show off for some imaginary audience. They can't help themselves.

Of course, they never achieve anything, and allow the neocon chicken hawks to swoop in and grab the initiative away from them.

That is why the neocons are running the country and the respectables are, as usual, acting like a bunch of turkeys.


The Friend of My Enemy Is My Enemy


One of the tactics of war is concealment. Everyone is familiar with the camouflage worn by soldiers and painted on military vehicles. The enemy can't strike what he can't see.

Modern warfare has evolved more advanced forms of concealment. Instead of trying to hide troops and vehicles and weapons from the enemy with camouflage, armies create fake targets, making it much harder for the enemy to find the real ones. The plan is to get them to use up ammunition on non-existent targets, while keeping the real targets hidden.

Respectables play this role for the left and the neocons. They create all sorts of false issues to take up the time and resources of the little guy who actually wants to do something. Before these people can find the real targets, respectables have worn them out and exhausted them with incidental issues.

As long as a respectable can perform this function, he is important to the left. Of course, they have no use for him once he is no longer able to perform this function effectively. That is why the respectable must work so hard to keep up appearances.

In real war, such behavior is called "aiding and abetting the enemy." Such people are called traitors.

One can bet that the Mohammedans knew what to do with traitors.

Maybe we can learn a bit from diversity after all.

Bob's Blog
Current Articles
Article Archive
Whitaker's World View
World View Archives
About Bob Whitaker
Contact Bob
Privacy Policy
DON'T you miss 'em! What could he say next?   Plenty.


Bob's first book - 1976 A Plague On Both Your Houses

Bob's second book - 1982 The New Right Papers
The New Right Papers

Bob's deadliest book - 2004 Why Johnny Can't Think: America's Professor-Priesthood
Why Johnny Can't Think

Copyright 2001. All rights reserved. Contact: