Whitaker's Current Articles March 6, 2004
|
March 6, 2004 --
If You Say Anybody Ever Suffered but Jews,
You’re Anaziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews
March 6, 2004 --
When Troops Killed People on an American Campus
March 6, 2004 --
Did Clinton Destroy Dean?
March 6, 2004 --
Shooting at the Flag
Fun Quote:
You can fool anybody with statistics, but only
if he is a fool to start with.
Buy Bob's Book "Why Johnny Can't Think" from Amazon here!
If You Say Anybody Ever Suffered
But Jews, You are Anaziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews
Mel Gibson has
committed the unforgivable sin.
Gibson got so sick
of being attacked as an anti-Semite for his new movie about Christ's
crucifixion that HE ACTUALLY POINTED OUT THAT JEWS WERE NOT THE
ONLY PEOPLE IN HISTORY WHO EVER SUFFERED!
For the media, that
is straight Nazism!
One thing Gibson
pointed out was that, before Hitler took power in Germany, Stalin
starved twenty million Ukrainians kulaks to death. Stalin stated
that his aim was to destroy the kulak class. Kulaks were the more
successful peasants in Russia.
Alan Colmes ( the
liberal on Fox's Hannity and Colmes) was talking to Billy Graham's
son about this.
Colmes said it was
pure anti-Semitism to compare the "accidental" famine under Stalin to
the murder of Jews by Hitler!
Billy Graham's boy,
since he is a good pet conservative for liberals, more or less
agreed.
For the American
left, saying Stalin’s starving the kulaks to death was an accident
is an improvement. They used to say it didn’t happen at all.
Liberal Intellectuals who went to Russia in the 1930s said flatly,
"I saw no starving peasants."
Colmes admits they
starved, but he says Comrade Stalin had nothing to do with it.
So Mel Gibson is
now an official anti-Semite.
When Troops Killed People on an
American Campus
No, I am not
talking about Kent State. Kent State is the incident of troops
firing on campus that the media are still
screaming about. The Kent State incident was the last big campus riot against the
Vietnam War. It happened in 1972.
At Kent State University
students were shot by National Guard troops when the students were
throwing rocks at terrified young National Guardsmen.
The media used to deny the students
were throwing rocks. They admit it now, but they still call
the troops a bunch of fascists.
I am talking about
troops killing people on campus, but I am not talking about Kent
State.
Now that many
cities are openly defying Federal immigration law and protecting
illegal immigrants openly, I am reminded of another campus shooting.
In 1962 the State
of Mississippi openly defied Federal law and refused to integrate the
University
of Mississippi. The president at that time was Saint John of
Kennedy. Saint john of Kennedy sent the 101st Airborne Division to
occupy the University
of Mississippi. In the process, those Federal troops shot three people down in cold blood
on the University of Mississippi campus. Those people
were not throwing rocks at them.
No liberal has ever
complained about THAT campus killing.
You can defy
Federal law if you are doing for the political left.
Hell, you can shoot
people if you are doing it for the left.
No conservative
will ever mention any of this.
Did Clinton Destroy Dean?
All the media agree
that Howard Dean really lost it when he did all that shrieking right
after the New Hampshire
primary.
But weeks before
that primary, National Review had a cover that showed Dean red-faced
and shrieking in exactly the same way in an earlier speech. That was when Dean led in
the polls.
The Dean who lost
was the same man who was so far ahead previously.
So what really
happened?
To most of us, all
liberals tend to look alike. But to liberals who are fighting for
power, the differences are crucial.
Bill Clinton took
over the Democratic Party from the moderate side. His Democratic
Study Committee wanted a less fanatical leftism, a bigger appeal to
the South and West than to the Northeast liberals.
Howard Dean wanted
the Democrats to become complete leftists again. I don't want to
bore you to death with internal Democratic politics, but the fact is
that Dean was taking the Party away from the Clintons.
The Clintons want
the Democratic Party to lose in 2004 so Hillary can get the
nomination in 2008. But at the same time they do not want someone
nominated in 2004 who will take the Party away from them.
Howard Dean had a
lot of weaknesses, but nobody seemed to notice them as he forged
ahead as the leftist candidate. Then suddenly they were
noticed and Dean was out.
William Jefferson
Clinton is a political genius. If I had his access to the press, I
could have destroyed Dean and left no traces of it. And I am
nowhere near Clinton's
genius in practical politics.
What the Democrats
now have is exactly what the Clintons would want. They are once
again nominating a Massachusetts
liberal for president. The Democrats have not won with anybody but a
Southerner since 1960.
What luck! The
Clintons
have exactly what they want!
And if you believe
that was just luck, I have about a dozen bridges I want to sell
you.
Shooting at the
Flag
Wouldn't you love to be a general who discovered that your
opposite number, the enemy general, only shot at your flag?
In other words, wherever you put your flag up, that is the only
place the enemy directs his bombers, his artillery, and his ground
assaults?
You could store your munitions in one place, have your air bases
in another, mobilize your ground forces in another place, and put
your flag miles away from all of them.
That is how the battle between the left and right is waged today.
Conservatives send frantic newsletters to each other about how
Clinton lies, about how Bush lies, about how the latest liberal
demands are insane. They fire frantically at whatever the
liberals put up.
Meanwhile, the liberal base is ignored. Their base is the
universities. We give them our children and we give them our
money to recruit and mobilize with on every campus. Every now and
then somebody complains about how biased the universities are, but
nobody fires directly at them.
"Why Johnny Can't Think" is a call for a total assault on the
enemy BASE. It is not just a criticism, it is a call for
revolution. It discredits all the present social sciences and
calls for academia to be "defrocked and defunded."
"Why Johnny Can't Think" says that the cry of "academic freedom"
is used by today's leftist professors in exactly thee same way
monopolists used "free enterprise" in 1900 to defend their right to
fix prices.
One chapter is called, "And When Do We Want It? NOW!"
Not only must "social scientists" be fired, the universities
must make reparations for their crimes.
No book has ever attacked the enemy base this way.
On the other hand, how would you like to be in the army where your
general only fired at the flag?
You would be dead meat, right?
That's where those who oppose the left are today.
|