|
Whitaker's Current Articles May 10, 2003
|
Fun Quote:
I wrote this in the Southern Partisan many years ago:
"The word 'moron' is a legal, not a medical, term. It means a
person with an IQ
between 50 and 70. An 'idiot' is a person with an
IQ between 0 and 30."
"In other words, a moron is twice as smart as an idiot."
"This proves that there is a real difference
between Republicans and Democrats."
O'Reilly Agrees: The Only Point of Integration
is to get Rid of Whites
To prove his respectability, O'Reilly of "The
O'Reilly Factor" went ballistic about white
Georgia students who held their own prom.
As O'Reilly knows, integration is not about
equal educational opportunity.
Among liberals the discussion goes
straight to interracial sex.
Harvard professor Noel Ignatiev put it honestly
and bluntly,
"The goal of abolishing the white race is on its
face so desirable that
some may find it hard to believe that it could incur
any opposition other
than from committed white supremacists."
O'Reilly says that if the races don't dance
together, it is Evil.
He says that since this is called the "United"
States, mixed dancing is mandatory.
O'Reilly says that American patriotism requires
interracial dancing.
O'Reilly says that American soldiers died in
Iraq for mixed dancing.
O'Reilly is a sicko.
Liberals Say We Need to Enforce Integration
Because It Doesn't Work
While everybody has to praise integration to the skies, its
supporters have been reduced to arguing that it is good because
people don’t want it.
Liberals point out that the minute affirmative action is ended,
minority enrollment
in primarily white schools drops to near zero.
Liberals say that if integration is not enforced, the races will
separate, the way they want to. O’Reilly admits that blacks and
Hispanics have their own groups and he says he’s against that, too.
You and I both know he doesn’t care about that. Lots of his viewers
pointed it out and he said that didn’t justify that Evil White Prom.
Ads on television show black high school students not wanting a white at
their table in the school cafeteria. Another ad shows younger white kids
playing together and black kids playing together. In both ads, this is
Evil and force clearly needs to be applied.
How Did O'Reilly Get so Screwed Up?
It took a long, long time for the alcohol and drug recovery experts to
admit that alcoholism is hereditary. Social sciences hate heredity, since
what they sell is environment.
After all, the more important heredity is, the less education alone can save
the world. The more important heredity is the less psychology can change
the world. The more important heredity is, the less sociology determines the
future of the world.
Stalin killed most of his geneticists for saying heredity was important.
Leftism hates heredity because they want to change the world by their own
programs. The more heredity matters, the less leftists can change the world.
O’Reilly was a school teacher. He was raised on education courses that told
him that heredity couldn’t matter. So he told the audience that nobody can
be born with more susceptibility to alcohol than anybody else.
When identical twins are adopted into different families at birth, they not
only tend to commit the same number of crimes, they commit them at the same
age and they tend to be the same crimes. That is because identical twins have
the same genes no matter who adopts them.
O’Reilly stated flatly that genes don’t make people do anything. That is a
good line for an education major. That is a good line to make you respectable
to liberals. But it makes no sense at all.
O’Reilly is fun to watch and he has guts. But always remember that the only
education he ever had was education courses, and, on some issues, he never
grew out of it.
That is why O’Reilly, who has common sense on any other issue, is such a
nut-case integrationist.
It is also the reason he is allowed on national television.
Liberals
and O'Reilly Must be Enforced Because it Doesn't Work
On one program O’Reilly criticized home schooling because of its lack of
“diversity.”
He then admitted home schooling provided a much better education , but
that doesn’t matter the way diversity does.
O’Reilly then proceeded to wonder out loud why, while more money is being
poured into it, public education keeps getting worse.
It might just be because of “diversity.”
“Diversity” is bad for real education. Children need to learn their
ABCs at that age. They do not need to learn to study with rap music
and shouting around them at the same time.
The District of Columbia spends about ten thousand dollars per year
per student and its schools are in a state of collapse.
This “diversity” nonsense fits into the general pattern of “modern”
education. Everything, especially “social adjustment” stuff, is more
important than education.
That is the main reason public education gets worse and worse with more
and more O’Reilly normally pushes integration in the name of “equal
education.”
But his having a fit about a separate prom shows he wants integration for
its own sake. Your education doesn’t include the prom.
One
Way to End Freedom is to Trivialize It
O’ Reilly and all the respectable conservatives love to bear their
chests and shout about how much they love Freedom.
A person who loves freedom would talk about the fact that all
Communist countries had to kill people who tried to escape, while
we have to keep them out. Conservatives never mention the Communist
border guards and they only apologize for our need to patrol our own borders.
They say our border guard is a regrettable necessity rather than something
to be proud of. In other words, the fact that we are a country everybody
wants to live and people want to escape from Communist countries means
nothing to respectable conservatives. That has nothing to do with the
respectable conservatives’ idea of Freedom.
So what is this so-called Freedom these respectable
conservatives are so big on?
Conservatives are for any freedom that doesn’t seriously offend liberals.
Liberals and respectable conservatives trivialize the idea that freedom is
a bunch of “ordinary” people doing what they want and getting what they want.
So O’Reilly says that the fact that white students want a separate
prom doesn’t mean a thing.
Real freedom is doing what you want to do. It does not have to call itself
A Class Struggle or a True Democracy or True Diversity or anything else.
If you make your society a Class Struggle you build walls to keep real people
in, what conservatives call “ordinary people," in. The argument that keeps
those walls up is that the Class Struggle is more important than just letting
people do what they want to do.
In the name of their capitalized Freedom they trivialize real freedom.
Notice that I capitalize O’Reilly’s idea of Freedom. It is nothing like real
freedom.
Real freedom means doing what you want to do.
Real freedom can only be limited on a case-by-case basis. There is no
easy-to-use general recipe that will make a free society.
Freedom does not mean the right to do anything that does not offend others.
As a matter of fact, real freedom means nothing if it does not offend and
inconvenience others. Communists offer you any freedom that they feel does
not hurt others. So do Nazis.
Clichés will not give you freedom. If all you had to do to have freedom
was say, “You have the right to do anything that doesn’t bother other
people,” freedom would be as easy as liberals think it is. The third world
could be free without any painful thinking on the part of voters.
But freedom is a case by case thing, a matter of judgment. It means nothing
if you have no right to do anything that others don’t like.
Freedom is a matter of judgment. That is why a country that is full of
third world voters cannot be free.
See April 7, 2001 -
CALIFORNIA BROWNOUT
Freedom is a matter of judgment. That is why a nation run by social
scientists and education majors cannot be free.
|
