CURRENT  ARTICLES

 

This week's Fun Quote

"I would not live within a hundred miles of a damned Yankee."
-- Daniel Boone

The Three Word Solution to the North Korean Problem

 
In the 1960s there was a deep discussion going on at the University of Virginia 
about Urban Guerillas.   I just sat there, thinking it was all pretty silly.   
Finally someone put it to me: “What do we do if Urban Guerrillas take over a 
major city?”
 
I replied, “Turn off the water.”
 
That had never occurred to anybody.
 
Everybody is having Deep Thoughts about North Korea right now.   I sit there 
reflecting on what silly asses we have as commentators.
 
If anyone were to ask me what we should do about the Peace Loving Democratic 
People’s Republic of North Korea, my answer would be one word shorter than what 
I said about Urban Guerrillas:
 
“Let ‘em sink.”
 
Like everything else leftist, Communism is silly.  No Communist state has ever 
survived without constant help from non-Communist countries.   Right after 
Lenin took over Russia Herbert Hoover led a major project that kept the Soviets 
from starving to death 
 
North Korea wants the food and money and other means of survival that we have 
always given every Communist state throughout history.  
 
We’ll find a way to give it to them.
 
As for the safety of the United States, I have a suggestion:
 
Let us pull American troops out of Korea and put HALF of them on the Mexican 
border.  America would be much safer if we had half as many troops protecting 
our own Mexican border as we have protecting South Korea’s border.
 
We could have saved hundreds of millions of lives throughout history if we had 
just let the Reds collapse with their own silliness.
 
Communism is still silly and the answer to it is still the same.

Another Word That Causes Respectable Conservatives to Grovel and Drool

 

Harvard professor Noel Ignatiev is one of the few honest men on the left.  He 
says, "The goal of abolishing the white race is on its face so desirable that 
some may find it hard to believe that it could incur any opposition other than 
from committed white supremacists." 
 
Respectable conservatives live to prove that they are more fanatically “anti-
racist” than liberals are.  “Anti-racist” means that one supports today’s world 
policy of demanding massive third-world immigration and integration for EVERY 
white country and ONLY for white countries. 
 
“Anti-racist” is a code word for abolishing the white race, as Ignatiev points 
out.   No one is allowed to talk about what that code word “anti-racist” 
means.   The word “racist” is used to make conservatives grovel and drool.
 
Respectable conservatives are allowed to speak on the liberal-ruled media 
because they satisfy liberals.   To satisfy liberals, one thing they must do is 
gibber and drool when the word “racist” is used.
 
Another word a respectable conservative has to scream at is “isolationist."   
An “isolationist” is a person who believes that America’s vital interests are 
within our own borders.

What Happens If You're not an "Isolationist"

 
Earlier Americans took what we call “isolationism” for granted.  As Secretary 
of State John Quincy Adams put it, “We are the friend of liberty everywhere, 
but the guardians only of our own.”
 
The same liberals who require conservatives to gibber and cry if they are 
called “isolationists” are now complaining that America has abandoned 
“isolationism." 
  
Liberals are moaning that the Bush Administration is going to attack a country 
that has not attacked us.   This complaint would be okay if I made it, but it 
is truly ridiculous coming from liberals.
 
If you are not an “isolationist” it means that you believe that America’s vital 
interests are all over the world.
 
As President Bush would be the first to point out, only an “isolationist” would 
take America’s borders seriously.
 
Earlier Americans objected to using force outside our own borders unless we 
were attacked.   But if you condemn “isolationism" you have condemned the 
assumption that our borders are critical to our vital interests.
 
Where a country has “vital interests,” that country has the right to use 
force.  If you are not an “isolationist”, you are saying that our vital 
interests are everywhere.
 
So if you are not an “isolationist” you are saying that America now has the 
right to use force all around our “interdependent” world. 
  
Liberals say so.
 
Conservatives say so.
 
So we can attack anywhere we damned well please.
 
If you condemn “racism,” you are anti-white.  Anti-racist is a code-word for 
anti-white.   By the same token, if you condemn "isolationism,” you are saying 
that America has as much right to use its forces outside our borders as inside 
them.
 
No conservative will ever mention this, so WhitakerOnline will. 
 

George Bush Wants to Join OPEC

Respectable conservatives live by liberal words like “racist” and “isolationist."
There is a huge amount of competition between conservatives to get that 
label “respectable."   In order to be a respectable conservative, you have to 
prove that liberal approval means more to you than anything else on earth.
 
The one thing that is important to President Bush is to show that he is not in 
Iraq "fighting for oil."   That is what the liberals told him he had better not 
do, and their wish is a respectable conservative’s command.
 
Exactly how would you prove that America fought “for oil” in Iraq?  
 
Liberals are saying that Bush will fight in Iraq “to get cheap oil” for 
Americans.  What does “cheap oil” mean?
 
“Cheap oil” means that Americans would get oil for a price lower than that set 
by OPEC. George Bush would rather die than get cheap oil for Americans.
 
So the price for Iraqi oil under Bush will be whatever price OPEC sets.
 
See WOL World View for February 8, 2003 – “America Will Join OPEC against 
Americans” 
 
A respectable conservative will back OPEC, abolish the white race and bus his 
children into the ghettoes to keep liberals from calling him names.  No price 
is too high for a conservative to avoid a liberal label.
 
American politics is hungry for a party devoted to selfish American interests, 
rejecting diversity, punishing criminals cheaply, paying off minorities, white 
“racism” and everything else respectable conservatives and liberals oppose.

 

 

Home | Current Articles | Article Archive | About Bob Whitaker | Contact Bob | Links | Privacy Policy

MENU

Home

Current Articles

Article Archive

Whitaker's World View

World View Archives

About Bob Whitaker

Contact Bob

Links

Privacy Policy


Current Issue
Issue: Feb. 22, 2003
Editor: Rick Rowland
© 2003 WhitakerOnLine.org


Email List
Sign up for our email list to be notified of site updates:
E-Mail:

© Copyright 2001, 2002. All rights reserved. Contact: bob@whitakeronline.org