|
|
| |
National Review Responds to Bob
|
|
The following was published in the last National
Review:
Dear Mr. Buckley:
Re a certain column of yours: The
"southern states" and the "Southern states" are
two totally distinct entities. The most southerly
state is Hawaii. California, Arizona, New Mexico
and Texas border on Mexico. Three of those four
are not usually included in the term "Southern"
and, according to Lyndon Johnson, neither should
Texas be. And, of course, Puerto Rico would be included
in "the south." In fact, "southern" includes
many more states that are not Southern and they
total tens of millions in population.
Robert W. Whitaker
Columbia, SC
Dear Mr. Whitaker: Yes, of course,
and the confusion is common.
Cordially, WFB (William F. Buckley)
|
CNN Jerks the Old Liberal Knee
|
|
Last week we talked about how puzzled reporters
have been that white gentile children being kidnapped
and murdered has gotten so much attention lately.
They point out that forty or fifty such kids are
grabbed and done away with by perverts every year.
What's the problem?
Those kids are almost always killed by criminals
liberal crime policy lets back on the streets, so
the media don't like discussing it. It has no "news
hook" value, which means it has no value to some
liberal cause.
National media are still talking about the 2000
murder of a black man by being dragged behind a
pickup truck and an earlier murder of a young man
for being homosexual. Those crimes were newsworthy
because they were useful, but non-minority kids
being murdered has no such value.
Nobody remembers anything, so we got a useful reminder
on the Cable News Network of how this "useful news
only" rule worked perfectly before the advent of
Fox Cable News. We have been listening to reports
about the Washington, DC, area sniper for a week
with no "news hook."
So CNN did what it has always done when there was
a crime: they started talking about gun control.
They cross examined police experts about whether
a gun control law would take care of this situation.
They had a debate on gun control.
A couple of years ago every police official would
have said that gun control was at least a part of
the solution. It was the ONLY crime solution liberals
ever offered, so everybody had to say it was very,
very important.
But sometimes the bad guys do lose. Like all liberal
policies, gun control doesn't work. It either increases
crime or leaves it the same.
Gun control is very, very important to the media
because it is the ONLY measure that liberals advocate
that sounds anti-crime. Actually, if you poll any
prison population you will find that almost every
felon is all for gun control. Every liberal policy
is pro-criminal, but this is the only one that at
least SOUNDS like it's "getting tough."
So CNN did what all national media have always
done: a crime spree meant a push for gun control.
But this time it didn't seem to take.
Is it possible that liberalism may be seen to be
so silly that even the national media have to suppress
their knee-jerk reactions? Respectable conservatives
are paid to regard leftism with great seriousness.
But despite respectable conservative efforts, the
sheer silliness of the idea that college professors
should rule the world seems to be collapsing under
the weight of its own failure.
|
|
|
|
|
Liberals want everybody to forget everything that liberals
used to predict. They used to say that socialism was inevitable
and efficient. Now not only do they not say that, their
respectable conservative helpers forget they ever said
that. They used to say that genetics had no effect on
human action. With DNA and gene-tracking, respectable
conservatives must forget liberals ever said that.
Pretty well everything that every Liberal Intellectual
used to shout loudly is forgotten. So that CNN attempt
to "news hook" the sniper for gun control was a reminder
that no respectable conservative is going to mention.
In fact, Phil Donahue is the only regular reminder we
have of at least a part of what the liberal faith used
to be when there was no one to laugh at it. With Arab
terrorists killing thousands, Donahue's only concern is
that Arabs may be profiled. Even blacks, the liberals'
most slavish supporters, favor profiling Arabs more than
whites do.
Chris Matthews, who is on MSNBC just before Phil Donahue,
is openly complaining that Phil could destroy his program.
Old Phil is singing the old song and wagging his head
in that way that always used to convince the housewives,
but he is trying to sell that crap to an intellectually
mature audience that was raised with all of Donahue's
favorite social policies in action.
I hate Phil Donahue, but he is a great counterbalance
to the pro-liberal efforts of respectable conservatives.
He still truly believes that if you are nice to criminals
they will be nice, too. He truly believes that bureaucrats
and college professors are the only people who know how
to run the economy and the only people not driven by guilt.
He maintains his faith that, despite its disastrous failure
in the past, educational experimentation will be a big
success in the future.
As long as respectable conservatives rule the opposition,
the only reminders we have of the old "Truly Intellectual"
knee-jerk left are those who will never learn,like CNN
and Phil.
|
|
|
|
There was a report in the news that WHO, the World Health
Organization, had announced that there would be no more
blondes on earth in two hundred years. WHO had made no
such announcement.
It will be a lot less than two hundred years before real
blondes are wiped out. There will be people with blond
hair in two hundred years but they will be yellow-haired
people with Oriental or Negroid features.
If a black child suffers extreme vitamin deficiency,
he develops reddish hair as a symptom. So in a world without
whites, there will be plenty of fair-haired children.
They'll just be sick colored people the way most people
were before whites came along or they'll be horrible-looking
mixes, also with food deficiencies.
Genocide against whites is an evil thing, but nobody
likes to say so. Buchanan likes to say whites are disappearing,
but it's only because they don't have enough religion
or because we are getting an empire not a republic.
The most miscegenated countries on earth have plenty
of religion. But brown countries with more religion are
just as stagnant and hopeless as ones without. A world
without whites will be the same way.
My deepest apologies to Pat Buchanan and to the Reverend
Ike, but God will NOT provide you with a brand new Cadillac
for giving money to the preacher.
But it sounds much better to talk about Family Values
or about A Republic, Not an Empire than it does to say
flatly that whites are unique and doing away with them
is EVIL. No one dares say "I am white, and I refuse to
give up my race."
See September 14, 2002 - White Race
Traitors Are the True Idealists.
So we quote Alan Keyes to show how non-racist we are,
and talk in grandiose terms about empires and Family Values.
Sorry, but the real world is not designed to let you
say only what makes you look good. On Judgment Day the
question will be what you did about two simple four-letter
words, Good and Evil.
|
|
|
| |
Home
| Current Articles | Article Archive | About
Bob Whitaker | Contact Bob | Links
| Privacy
Policy
|
|
|