Paul Craig Roberts' national column last week discussed a Jewish professor at Harvard who founded a group called Race Traitors:

http://www.townhall.com/columnists/paulcraigroberts/pcr20020906.shtml

Their motto is, "Treason to the white race is loyalty to humanity."

I have known about the organization for a long time, but it didn't strike me as anything impressive. There is nothing surprising to me about a professor openly demanding an end to the white race. It is one thing everybody in academia is required to agree on.

This particular anti-white Harvard Professor, Noel Ignatiev, is surprised that anybody is surprised by his being paid, like everybody else at a university, to preach an end to the white race. Ignatiev says,

"The goal of abolishing the white race is on its face so desirable that some may find it hard to believe that it could incur any opposition other than from committed white supremacists."

I have been hit with that line all my life, from both liberals and conservatives.

Coast to coast, a lot of conservatives are denouncing Ingnatiev's perfectly honest statement of national policy. They act as if they haven't been saying the same thing.

Well, DUH! Every respectable conservative has to announce the means he prefers to follow to get rid of whites. People like Pat Buchanan may ask that immigration to America from the third world be slowed down, but even Buchanan has to demand that immigration and integration take place so that the white majority will be turned brown.

Buchanan tried to argue against the browning of America a couple of times and got slapped down.

Buchanan now obeys the rule that has been true all of my considerable lifetime:

Anyone who does not have a plan to get rid of the white race is anaziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews. No one is allowed to question the goal of a "raceless," by which they mean a whiteless, world. Nobody expects Africa to change or Asia to change its race, and no one cares one way or the other.

And this does not just mean leftist professors at Harvard. This is EVERYBODY: "There is no room for racism in America."

Ignatiev just said what he assumed we all knew:

"The goal of abolishing the white race is on its face so desirable that some may find it hard to believe that it could incur any opposition other than from committed white supremacists."

Everyone who is not a racist in this society subscribes to what Ignatiev says. So while I applaud Roberts's guts in talking about this guy, I wonder where the hell he has been all this time?

In his article Roberts follows the rules of respectable conservatism. He puts "the white race" in quotes, something he never does with blacks.

Ignatiev does not put "the white race" in quotes. He has no doubt about what he's trying to do away with. Neither does anybody else.

For a while, Craig Roberts himself ran the editorial page of the "Wall Street Journal." He must have been very good to be hired for that, because he has written columns asking why, in the Holy Name of Diversity, no one dares to say that white countries should be preserved.

But no one disagrees with the continued existence of white majority countries more than does the Wall Street Journal. The Journal officially demands that a constitutional amendment be passed that says, simply, "There shall be no borders."

The Wall Street Journal wants all the cheap labor that can flow in from the third world. Like the Libertarian Party, they assume that, when they become citizens, those masses would not vote to redistribute the wealth through a big government.

I was in school with Craig Roberts many years ago, and he is not that kind of fool. It takes guts to say what he said, and I applaud him. But Ignatiev is perfectly correct. Nobody is allowed to join in public discussion unless he can demonstrate that he is HONESTLY devoted to the abolition of white skin.

There is no room in this world for racism. Racism comes in only one color, and everybody who can read knows it.

And Craig Roberts says so:

"College students will tell you that a university education today is a guilt trip for whites." And Roberts reaches a conclusion that will not surprise readers of WhitakerOnline:

"Ignatiev has an idea like Hitler. A race is guilty and must go. The communists said it was a guilty class that had to go. If you thought genocide was left behind in the 20th century, be apprised that today genocide has a home in the educational system."