|
|
| |
THEY GOT SKAKEL, NOW HOW ABOUT CHAPPAQUIDDICK?
|
|
Editor's note: The title says it all. There is no
article.
|
EUROPEAN
THIRD PARTIES WIN A HISTORIC VICTORY
|
|
This is the only place you will see news of one
of history's great political victories. Every country
in Europe is now moving to tighten down on immigration.
Every country in Europe is using one excuse.
They are all saying that they are not tightening
immigration for their countries' benefit. All European
leaders are saying they are doing this to stop the
growth of right wing anti-immigration parties.
What you will never read anywhere else is what
this means in plain English:
It means that the third parties have a won a victory
that they were created to win. If Le Pen's National
Front or the other parties had done like American
conservatives and voted with libertarian rightists
who want open borders, the flow of third worlders
in Europe would have kept expanding.
It is only the first step, but it is a REAL first
step that is taking place in Europe.
Here we didn't even get to step one. Our votes
go to conservatives no matter what they do in the
real world. So we get no action on immigration.
What's the point of "conservative" victories if
your country becomes third world? Our "conservative"
President Bush is avoiding any real decisions by
creating a new department. But leftist European
governments are tightening their borders because
of voters who were not afraid of being branded Evil
Racists.
If you don't demand better, you don't get better.
Period.
|
|
| |
|
| |
The problem with our borders is that George Bush wants
open borders.
The problem with the FBI and CIA is that a bunch of failures
without any moral courage never lose anything when they
fail - AGAIN. They are all getting promoted.
So no one is going to do anything about the real problems.
So what ARE they going to do in Washington?
They are going to do what they always do in Washington
when the will is not there to change policy. They are
going to create a new governmental department.
The problem with education since the 1950s has been education
policy. Education scores kept dropping and no one wanted
to take on the National Education Association.
So the Carter Administration created a new Department
of Education. Have you noticed how education has improved
since the Department of Education was created?
Me neither.
Creating new departments to deal with failure is an admission
of defeat. That is all that the creation of Bush's new
Department of Homeland Defense means.
|
| |
|
| |
We had the fun, now we pay for it.
There is a chasmic difference between a country ruled
by whites with blacks living there and a country where
the actual bloodline makes everybody brownish. Compare
blood-mixed Brazil and white and black America, for instance.
But nobody can be allowed to say that. It's more fun
to say everybody's equal and to proclaim our triumph at
the independence of Africa and Pakistan and India from
Evil Whites.
"All men are created equal," you know. The third world
has as much right to sovereignty and a-bombs as whites
do, you know.
We have been enjoying all that crowing about equality
for over half a century. Pakistan and India are just as
good as we are. We were so proud and the liberals told
us we were so smart to say that.
So now they got the bombs. All that fun has to be paid
for.
So stop whining.
|
|
|
|
Many good and kind people were involved in the Inquisition.
Some of the priests who had devoted their lives to their
faith and to kindness to other human beings were leaders
in torturing and burning people alive.
From their point of view, torturing others was their
ultimate sacrifice for the Good Cause. They honestly believed
that to be kind to heretics would be the worst kind of
cruelty to them.
After all, by slowly torturing these people to death
they were giving them a chance to repent and avoid an
eternity in Hell. And they were taking action against
other people being damned to eternal torture in Hell by
digging out the heretics.
In fact, this argument is irrefutable. If an Inquisitor
had shown simple mercy, he would have been favoring his
own personal prejudice in favor of not hurting somebody
to the much greater cause of stamping out heresy.
This is usually true when mercy is shown. If there is
no reason to hurt somebody most sane people will avoid
it. The only time you need to appeal to mercy is when
there IS an excuse for hurting people. In war, the choice
is often between the Cause and mercy, and mercy is often
interpreted as treason.
But the fact is that throughout most of history most
Great Causes have been wrong or not as important as people
like the Inquisitors thought they were. If people were
always right, there would be no need for mercy.
But in real history, people feel the need for "mercy"
when they truly believe it is just a weakness, a prejudice
which they should ignore. So in real history, human beings
should have listened to that voice of prejudice rather
than to whatever cause called them to brutality.
|
|
NO
PREJUDICE MEANS NO MORALITY
|
|
Recently conservatives were screaming because homosexual
kissing was being shown on network TV. Yet these same
conservatives will kill to make sure that interracial
kissing and coupling is shown on network TV without objection.
They will lynch people like me who openly say they don't
like it.
For leftism, the whole "War on Racism" has been the key
to victory. They have one set of conservatives demanding
the end of the "prejudices" of another group of conservatives.
That means you can destroy any vestige of morality, because
you can denounce everybody else's morality as "prejudice."
Once you force everybody to agree that criticizing blacks
and blondes kissing in public is Nazism, then you can
force them to agree that men slobbering men in public
is OK with everybody but Nazis.
The same scream of "prejudice" that liberals use against
me is used by NAMBLA to justify boy-man sex. They tell
us that the Ancient Greeks had man-boy sex all the time
so our dislike of it is just a prejudice.
And HITLER was against man-boy sex!!
The battle against prejudice is called a "War Against
Racism" but it is actually a campaign against whites.
It is only aimed at immigration and integration of all
white majority countries. What they call "race mixing"
is actually only aimed against one race.
So the War Against Prejudice is both a genocidal campaign
and a campaign against morality.
And in both of these battles, against whites and against
Western Morality, leftists have no more dedicated allies
than the respectable conservatives.
|
|
HOMOSEXUAL
AND INTERRACIAL
|
|
During the presidential campaign, Alan Keyes declared
that, since he is a black man married to an Indian woman,
the Federal Government should condemn Bob Jones University
for any ban on interracial dating. And that is ALL he
said about it.
Every respectable conservative is ready to die for the
right of blondes and blacks to fondle each other in public.
Then they get terribly upset when homosexual kisses and
other activities are shown on television.
Every single state that adopted the Constitution banned
interracial marriage. But conservatives now agree that
anyone who says a state should have the right to do that
should be vetoed from serving anywhere in the American
Judiciary.
Then those same conservatives get upset that, for some
reason, everybody laughs at them when they talk about
Strict Construction of the Constitution.
Hating whites comes first. Hating Southerners comes first.
As long as that is the case, conservatives are laughed
at because they SHOULD be laughed at.
Meanwhile, if I have to watch blondes and blacks slobber
on each other, others should have to watch two guys slobber
over each other in public. I call my preference morality,
liberals call it prejudice. As long as you agree with
them on fighting my moral stands, why should you have
any right to object to the same people violating yours?
|
|
|
| |
Home
| Current Articles | Article Archive | About
Bob Whitaker | Contact Bob | Links
| Privacy
Policy
|
|
|