ARCHIVE ARTICLES

 

ISLAM AND TOLERANCE OF OTHER RELIGIONS


The Koran says the infidel must be crushed. At the same time we are constantly told that Islam is a tolerant religion.

I hate to interrupt a perfectly good shouting match with information, but as usual there is a lot to what both sides are saying.

Moslems often refer to all non-Moslem faiths as "infidels." Sunni Moslems refer to Shiite Moslems as "heathens" and Shiite Moslems refer to Sunni Moslems as "infidels." Like most insults, these labels are not strictly accurate.

When the Koran uses the word "infidel," it is referring to faiths which are not derived from the Old Testament. Judaism, Christianity and Islam all recognize the Old Testament. Moslem countries allowed Jews and Christians to practice their own faith. In Moslem countries, Christians and Jews were discriminated against, but they were not killed.

Pagans, true infidels, were killed by Islam. So those who worshipped the old Greek gods or the old Arab tribal deities were slaughtered outright. Followers of all the old religions of Northern Europe were burned alive.

This is exactly the same approach medieval Christians used in relation to Jews. Jews were permitted to practice their religion in Catholic countries, in Eastern Orthodox countries, and in Protestant countries, but a "pagan" was burned alive.

A Jew who practiced his Old Religion was tolerated in every Christian land. But any of my ancestors who practiced his Old Religion was burned alive. Jews are the only ones we hear complaining about discrimination because they are the only ones who are still alive to do so.

No one complains about the burning of "heathens" by Christians because our old religions were wiped out by pure intolerance. The only people still around to complain are Jews, so the significance of the fact that they were allowed to live and practice their faith under Christians and Moslems is totally ignored.

So what we call the tolerance of Islam, slaughtering infidels but not Jews, was practiced by Christians.

When Jews were persecuted they went to Moslem lands or to other Christian lands. This sort of "Tolerance" is a very relative term.

According to the Old Testament, today's Israel was taken from its native inhabitants complete with blood, fire and genocide. Islam was spread with the sword just as Old Testament Judaism was. So the Crusaders, about whom Christians feel so guilty because they took the Holy Land by fire and sword, were simply the third of three faiths which took the same land the same way.

The forceful taking of Israel by the Jews in our age is a repetition of a very old process.

No faith based on the Old Testament is likely to be tolerant.

Pagans were almost always tolerant. Which may be why I must refer to them in the past tense.

EACH FAITH HAS A FATAL DISEASE


As I said, no one today makes the distinction between Jews who were allowed to practice their faith and members of every other non-Christian faith who were burned alive.

No Christian ever expresses any real guilt about the latter, and every Christian has to moan constantly about our treatment of Jews if he is not to be labeled anaziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.

So we refer to Islam as tolerant because it allowed Jews to live but discriminated against them, but Christian Guilt requires us to denounce Christians as Evil because of the same policy.

To the person being burned alive, this distinction was very important. But to a Christian whose life is built on Guilt, it means nothing. The person who calls himself a Christian but whose true religion is nothing but a giant guilt Complex has not the vaguest idea of what real history is about.

Islam does indeed degenerate into a pure terrorist warlike fanaticism. Christianity does indeed tend to degenerate into pure Guilt and total self-hatred.

Jesus said "love others as you love yourself." Christian self-hatred leads straight to a hatred of others.

 

WHAT IS THE DEGENERATE FORM OF JUDAISM?


The logic I am using here, like all logical thought, leads me into a piece of pure heresy against Political Correctness. If Christianity has a degenerate form because Christians are human beings, and if Islam has a degenerate form because Moslems are just human beings, is it possible that Jews are human, too?

If Jews are human, then Judaism has a degenerate form, too. But in America today, all the major Christian denominations and all the Jewish denominations agree that any gentile who utters any criticism of anything Jewish is at best an agent of Hitler and at worst an agent of Satan Himself. Which is just another way of saying that today's accepted Christianity and today's accepted Judaism have gone all the way to their degenerate form.

The degenerate form of Islam is terrorism and the degenerate form of Christianity is Guilt carried to the extreme of pure self-hatred. The degenerate form of Judaism is total self-pity. Self-pity leads to a desire for revenge. That leads straight to hatred.

The definition of degenerate Judaism is carried in the endlessly repeated words, "Five thousand years of Suffering." Degenerate Christianity has the same motto about Jews, who exist to Suffer. These two pitiful creatures agree that only Jews can Suffer and the only feeling a Christian should be capable of is Guilt and self-hate for Jewish Suffering.

Some of the serious Jews say that the Holocaust has completely replaced real religion in the minds of many Jews. I know for a fact that the worship of Israel and self-hatred has replaced Christ in the mainline Christian denominations of our day.

In the Koran there is enough about Holy War to allow mere humans to turn it into a religion of Terror. In the Old Testament, there is plenty about being Chosen and Unique Suffering to allow Jews to turn Judaism into pure self-pity and revenge. There is plenty in the words of St. Paul and in the New Testament in general to allow a Christian who tends that way to hate his own existence and to hate himself.

 

Home | Current Articles | Article Archive | About Bob Whitaker | Contact Bob | Links | Privacy Policy

MENU

Home

Current Articles

Article Archive

Whitaker's World View

World View Archives

About Bob Whitaker

Contact Bob

Links

Privacy Policy


Current Issue
Issue: Mar. 9, 2002
Editor: Virgil H. Huston, Jr.
© 2001 WhitakerOnLine.org


Email List
Sign up for our email list to be notified of site updates:
E-Mail:

© Copyright 2001, 2002. All rights reserved. Contact: bob@whitakeronline.org