ARCHIVE ARTICLES

 

ISRAEL SPYING STORY SNATCHED OFF OF FOX


Last week I was congratulating Fox Cable News Network for daring to talk about Israeli spying.

It is clear that this phenomenon is no secret, since Israel is presently trying to get Jonathan Pollard released from a life sentence for spying against America for them. But Fox showed great courage in talking about it.

In a sane world, these two statements would seem odd.

Countries usually deny espionage or at least they apologize for it. But Israel openly demands that its American-born spy be released.

While everybody knows that Israeli spying takes place on a huge scale, we also know that no critic of Israel is allowed to talk about it. Israel and Dershowitz demand that their spy be released, but you and I are not allowed to even mention the whole subject.

We all know you can lose your job for mentioning Israeli spying. Anyone who talks about it is -- guess what? -- anaziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews. So I was astonished when Fox actually quoted an internal Federal memo which stated the rule that if you discussed Israeli spying you would lose your job.

I'm glad I mentioned it last week, because I now hear that Fox has snatched this story off the network and fired Carl Cameron who reported it. I wrote Fox to ask about this, but of course I got no reply.

Someone sent me a Fox URL on the story:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,40684,00.html

It says:
Carl Cameron
Friday, December 21, 2001
"This story no longer exists."

Here is a screen shot taken Thursday:

I doubt that URL will still be there when you read this.

As I say, I cannot confirm this because Fox, which exposes others, will not respond to me.

The whole thing is straight out of "1984", isn't it?

Editor's note: I also attempted to check this story out with Fox News. They aren't talking to me, either. I also wrote to Carl Cameron's foxnews.com email address - no response, which could mean he isn't commenting or is no longer employed there.

 

JOHN WALKER'S UNFASHIONABLE TREASON


I have the right to call John Walker a traitor. Practically nobody else in America today has that right.

That is because I have consistently denounced traitors. I did not wait to jump on one particular turncoat because it is fashionable to jump on him.

On September 10, 2001, the only white person who was truly moral was a white person who spoke of white people the way Goebbels spoke of Jews.

On September 10, 2001, the only truly moral American was one who blamed America for the world's problems.

On September 10, 2001, a good person was one who hated Christians. Every history lesson told us how good the Aztecs were and how evil the Christians were.

All my life American education taught that a young white American Christian like John Walker was only moral if he hated whites, Americans and Christians.

On September 10, 2001, the word "Idealist" described "The Love Generation," those 1960s hippies who were marching under the same Viet Cong flag that was actively killing Americans at the time. Jane Fonda was an Idealist for going to North Vietnam and pretending to man a gun that was used to shoot at American planes.

"Idealism," on September 10, 2001, was represented in the Woody Allen movie "The Front," where Allen played a 1950s writer protecting outright and outspoken Stalinists who were trying to give America to the Soviet Union.

Now everybody is astonished that John Walker went and fought for the Taliban.

They want him hanged.

But nobody wants any other traitors even criticized, much less prosecuted. Unlike Walker, these others were not traitors, they were merely Idealists who supported the Democratic and Peace-Loving People's Republics.

Respectable conservatives are howling for Walker's hide, but not one of them has the guts to mention all the other traitors.

For pro-Israel "Christians" and leftists, treason is moral if you give the right reason for it.

 

FOR AN ADULT, IT AIN'T THE REASON, IT'S THE TREASON


Why is it that John Walker is a traitor while Jane Fonda or Jonathan Pollard is a "misguided idealist"?

The gun Jane Fonda posed with in Hanoi actually shot at American planes, and may have killed an American or two. She went to Vietnam while they were actually killing Americans and torturing American POWs.

Walker joined Al Queda long before the fighting started but all the conservative spokesmen want him hanged.

No conservative will ever demand the punishment for Fonda that he demands for Walker because liberals won't let him. It is liberals who allow conservatives to become "spokesmen" in the media, and any conservative who talked about leftist or pro-Israel treason would lose his respectability instantly.

The word "treason" is just fine if liberals say it.

There is nothing wrong with killing Americans if you do it for the Loving and Democratic Peoples' Republics. There is nothing wrong with spying against America if you do it for Israel.

I am told that Israel is the reason Christ died on the cross. Everybody says it's all right to blame pro-Israeli treason on Christ.

But John Walker should be hanged for blaming his treason on Mohammed.

I beg to differ. As someone who tries to be a Christian, I find treason blamed on Christ MORE offensive than Walker's treason in the name of Mohammed.

 

WITH WALKER, LIBERALS GIVE RESPECTABLES A CHANCE TO PRETEND THEY'RE BRAVE


This business with Walker is one of those times when liberals have given professional conservatives permission to pretend they're fearless.

You can't be professional conservative unless you are a full time professional wimp. You say what liberals allow you to say or the media dump you. That means you are always dodging anything serious

But at some times and on some issues, liberals give professional conservatives permission to beat their little chests and shout. Militant support of Israel is one of these issues. Even George Will once said that liberals want the United States armed forces to be "strong enough to defend Israel."

So conservatives beat their chests and pretend to be war heroes every chance they get. No conservative would be allowed to snub Jane Fonda or to point out the outright treasonous aspects of the Love Generation. But they are allowed to be shouting militants against John Walker.

On the talk shows, liberal commentators let conservatives demand that Walker be lynched.

For one who knows what the real game is, it is pathetic to watch the respectables beat their little chicken chests.

 

Home | Current Articles | Article Archive | About Bob Whitaker | Contact Bob | Links | Privacy Policy

MENU

Home

Current Articles

Article Archive

Whitaker's World View

World View Archives

About Bob Whitaker

Contact Bob

Links

Privacy Policy


Current Issue
Issue: Dec. 29, 2001
Editor: Virgil H. Huston, Jr.
© 2001 WhitakerOnLine.org


Email List
Sign up for our email list to be notified of site updates:
E-Mail:

© Copyright 2001. All rights reserved. Contact: bob@whitakeronline.org