ARCHIVE ARTICLES

 

 


If the crew hadn't landed in China, I am willing to bet we STILL wouldn't know about this incident. It would have been too embarrassing for the Chinese.

I pointed out on February 17, 2001, in THE BRASS IS WIMPING OUT ON AMERICAN SERVICEMEN, that Soviet ships regularly swerved against American ships all through the Cold War, and the American ships were ordered to back off.

I have no information on air incidents, just as we had no information that air incidents of this kind that have been taking place near China for the past year.

The Chinese were well aware that American conservatives would never publicly object to their aggressiveness because business loves cheap Chinese labor. And liberals are loath to criticize a Loving Democratic People's Republic.

So the Chinese pilot did what had become routine: he was being a bully. His Mach 2 jet flew too close to an American surveillance (not spy) plane with a 460-mph maximum speed. That 460-mph is less than a third of Mach 2.

But this time he got caught at it. The Chinese pilot hot-dogged a plane that couldn't hit back and he got himself killed.

That is about as childish a death as one can imagine.

What's more, the bully got what he deserved and all the Americans survived. How much face can one lose at one time?

 

 


When the Iranians seized the American embassy and took Americans hostage in 1979, the media called those people "hostages" almost from the word go. But they kept calling the Iranians who took and held them "students." It wasn't that Iran approved this, you see, it was just a bunch of unruly students who had stormed the Embassy.

It took the press a long time to finally stop calling those Iranians "students."

In the 1979 case, the problem was that the media did not know which side to be on. In Vietnam, only a few years earlier, they had been solidly on the side of those killing Americans. Until the American people made it clear they wouldn't stand for that this time, the media did a lot of pussyfooting. All that is forgotten today.

In 1979, when the Iranian hostages were taken, Teddy Kennedy had already announced that he was challenging sitting Democratic president Jimmy Carter for the nomination in 1980.

What you hear today is that the Iranian hostage crisis beat Teddy, which is true. But they also say that was because of the way Carter handled the hostage crisis early on, which is not true.

Teddy Kennedy reacted to the taking of our hostages in Teheran in the old Vietnam manner. He loudly attacked the United States and blamed the whole situation on us. In other words, he was a standard liberal. It didn't take long for that to destroy his bid for the presidential nomination.

You won't hear about that anywhere but here.

 

 


Recently, American officials have been telling the press that "Russia is not our ally."

The reminder was necessary, because press and government use the term "allies" about any country that is not actively at war with us.

When China seized our airmen, it never occurred to anybody that a single one of our "allies" would jump to our defense, even verbally. We are obligated to help European "allies" defend and police Europe, but they owe us nothing. We are obligated to "consult with our allies," but they owe us nothing.

Like "hostages," the word "allies" has a different meaning when the United States Government, also known as Uncle Sucker, uses it.

So what does "ally" mean to an English-speaking person?

In 1812, the United States declared war on Great Britain. France was already at war with Britain. But we were not allies.

This had very practical implications. For example, it sometimes happened that a huge British Man of War was in a neutral harbor with an American warship and a French warship. When this happened, it was almost always the case that the British ship totally outclassed its two enemy vessels combined.

If they had been allies, the Americans and the Frenchmen would have had to coordinate a mutual defense for the time when they had to leave the safe harbor. But since they were not allies, one ship could sneak away while the other went out and got shot to pieces.

Uncle Sucker has half that relationship with our "allies" today. If somebody attacks Europe or Canada, we must come to their aid. If there is trouble anywhere in Europe, we must take the lead in taking care of it. If we get into trouble, our "allies'" only obligation is to sit back and criticize.

During Vietnam, the people we called "allies" were almost all havens for our draft dodgers. If they were really allies, that was a historical first.

This one-way relationship is reflected in the constant demand that we "consult with our allies." If Uncle Sucker is about to do anything, it must get the permission of its "allies." If we ask them to consult with us, that's American imperialism.

You cannot mention this because Hitler was a bad man. Liberals and respectable conservatives accuse anyone who criticizes our one-way relationship with our "allies" of being an "isolationist." "Isolationists" were people who opposed America's entry into World War II before Pearl Harbor.

So if you don't kowtow to our "allies," that makes you anaziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.

 

Home | Current Articles | Article Archive | About Bob Whitaker | Contact Bob | Links | Privacy Policy

MENU

Home

Current Articles

Article Archive

Whitaker's World View

World View Archives

About Bob Whitaker

Contact Bob

Links

Privacy Policy


Current Issue
Issue: Apr. 14, 2001
Editor: Virgil H. Huston, Jr.
© 2001 WhitakerOnLine.org


Email List
Sign up for our email list to be notified of site updates:
E-Mail:

© Copyright 2001, 2002. All rights reserved. Contact: bob@whitakeronline.org