|
|
|
Shortly after the NAACP announced
its South Carolina boycott, Bob Jones IV joined
liberals and respectable conservatives in demanding
that the Confederate flag come down off the South
Carolina capitol dome. Liberals were delighted,
and Bob Jones was King For a Day in the State newspaper.
In joining our enemies, Bob Jones declared that
the flag offended blacks, and, as a Christian, one
should abandon symbols that offend blacks.
Well, as it turns out, the Confederate flag is not
the only symbol that offends blacks in South Carolina.
When George W. Bush made a major campaign speech
at Bob Jones University, the Vice President of the
United States made it clear that that name, too,
offended black people.
Respectable conservatives have no memory, but the
fact is that this is how the flag became a symbol
of offense to African-Americans. Polls showed that
the overwhelming majority of real live black people
found nothing offensive in a Southern symbol flying
over a Southern capitol. It was only after liberals
told them that they were offended that it became,
officially, an offense. The word that Bob Jones
University is offensive to black people has now
come from the same source.
I watched a discussion of the campaign on CNN. Since
Lee Bandy has to sleep sometime, CNN had to have
someone else commenting on the primary. They chose
a thoroughly respectable conservative and Tom Turnipseed.
Those two agreed that Bush offended black people
by speaking at Bob Jones.
When CNN had representatives of the two Republican
campaigns discussing the point, neither of them
would condemn Bob Jones. There are a lot of Bob
Jones graduates voting in the primary. But then
again, neither Bush nor McCain would join Jones
in demanding that the flag come down.
So we have the same lineup of people condemning
Bob Jones as offending black people as we have condemning
the Confederate flag as offending black people.
Isn't it time for Bob Jones to follow his own idea
of Christianity, and change the name of his University?
|
|
President Clinton stated the purpose
of the Kosovo bombing: "We must remember the
principle we and our allies have been fighting for
in the Balkans is the principle of multi-ethnic,
tolerant, inclusive democracy."
No matter what a country's population may want,
it is the announced purpose of the United States
Government to impose the melting pot. This will
be done by force if necessary.
In case Clinton's statement did not make this clear
enough, let us hear from the United States military:
General Wesley Clark stated America's goal for Europe:
"Let's not forget what the origin of the problem
is. There is no place in modern Europe for ethnically
pure states. That's a 19th century idea and we are
trying to transition into the 21st century, and
WE ARE GOING TO DO IT WITH MULTI-ETHNIC STATES."
The only difference between Clinton's position and
McCain is that McCain is far more fanatical about
it.
Senator McCain demanded that the United States consider
ground troops to enforce this melting pot policy
in Europe. He introduced legislation
to enormously increase funding and commitment
to crush whoever stands in the way of this Clinton-McCain
policy.
This is the official United States policy on national
self-determination. This is OUR issue. As a Southern
Nationalist I am mystified as to how any other nationalist
could endorse McCain.
|
|
|
Bush was depending on South Carolina to
save his candidacy against the winner in New Hampshire,
John McCain. After all, South Carolina saved his father
when Buchanan did well in that state, and South Carolina
really saved Dole when Buchanan beat him in the Granite
State. But everyone has, as always, forgotten the reason
for that.
Respectable conservatives have no memory, so Bush forgot
that the reason South Carolina Republican voters saved
his father and Dole was because, at the time, the national
media were quoting poll after poll that showed that Bush
Senior, and then Dole, would beat Clinton in the general
election. Needless to say, both were crushed in the general
election, getting about the same percentage as Goldwater
did in his 1964 landslide defeat.
But the media loves McCain, and the media are not there
for Bush this time. This time, the respectable conservatives
can go with the candidate that the press - for the moment
- dearly loves. Now the media are unanimously insisting
that the New Hampshire winner is the one who will beat
the Democratic nominee come November.
Maybe, just maybe, the nomination of McCain will give
a major kick to the Buchanan campaign this year. I plan
to discuss that point in a later WOL.
|
|
The European Union only took effect recently, and already
it has caught up with the United States Supreme Court
in dictating social policy throughout Europe. A "rights"
activist appealed to the European Court of Justice in
Luxembourg because parents are allowed to spank children
in Britain. They want the Court to declare all spanking
to be criminal assault, as it is in Sweden.
Germany's constitution forbids women to serve in the military.
The court struck that down. Britain has a regulation forbidding
homosexuals to serve in the armed forces, and nine in
ten Britons supports it. The Court struck it down.
Europe follows American trendy liberals, a.k.a. "political
correctness," in a slavish way which outdoes American
courts. Europe, which was once proud of its unique cultures,
has now declared that every country on the continent must
now be a "melting pot," just like Uncle Sam.
The heavy vote for the anti-immigration Freedom Party
in Austria has led Europe to threaten a total isolation
of that country if that party is allowed into the government.
No voter reaction to the melting pot in Europe will be
permitted. As I have said before, this policy applies
only to Europe and other white majority countries. No
one minds if Japan holds down immigration to a practical
zero. Formosa and China and Africa are welcome to remain
ethnically and culturally monoracial and monocultural.
But if Austrian voters or Australian voters or American
voters react against massive immigration, the whole world
must attack it. This is straight, open, and undisguised
genocide.
Given his track record, I am sure that McCain and his
supporters would label any objection to this policy as
racist. If it is, then I am proud to be their idea of
a racist.
The time eventually comes when you must either take their
labels or be a complete slave and wimp.
|
|
Home
| Current Articles | Article Archive | About
Bob Whitaker | Contact Bob | Links
| Privacy
Policy
|
|
|