Bob Whitaker's Weekly Articles  –  November 20, 1999


December 25, 1999  –  HAPPY SEASON!

December 25, 1999  –  BUSH ACTUALLY MAKES A POINT!

December 25, 1999  –  AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY IS RACIST, BUT NO ONE DARES SAY WHAT KIND OF RACISM IT IS

 

HAPPY SEASON!

 

I want everyone who sends out "Season's Greetings" cards to think about this: what would you think of someone who saved some of these cards, and send them out to their Jewish friends at Passover? It would be bad manners, wouldn't it?

You see, Passover is not just another "season" to Jews. It is one of the two most important Jewish holidays. So you wouldn't send a "Season's Greetings" card to a Jew at Passover because Jews have feelings. Fortunately Christians don't have feelings, so you can send all the "Season's Greetings" cards you want to at Christmas.

Almost every time I get a Christmas card from another Christian it has the salutation, "Season's Greetings." No Jew is going to see the card, but it is assumed that the Jewish population will be comforted knowing that no one is saying "Merry Christmas" behind their backs. Do Jews really stay awake at night worrying that Christians may be saying "Merry Christmas" to each other? None of the Jews that I know ever did.

But no one who formulates Political Correctness cares a fig what real, flesh-and-blood Jews worry about. Those demanding that the Confederate flag come down say their only concern is that it offends black people. Polls of real black people do not indicate that the main concern of black people in South Carolina is the Confederate flag. There is no evidence that most blacks were offended by it or even concerned about it until their "leaders" told them to be ( See October 30, 1999 article, "What the Flag Boycott Really Means.").

And those black leaders were following liberal orders. This sort of Political Correctness uses minorities as an excuse. But their real aim is to dictate the behavior of the white Christian majority. The aim of Political Correctness is power, pure and simple. Today we have the once free American population blubbering excuses and begging to be told what they are allowed to say and how they are allowed to say it.

Saying what we damned well pleased used to be the hallmark of an American. For those who wanted to rule us, this proud free speech was the first obstacle they had to overcome. If you doubt it has been overcome, look at the cards you receive on December 25, and count the number that refer to Christmas by name.

Happy Season!

 

BUSH ACTUALLY MAKES A POINT!

 

McCain, with the all out support of the media, is definitely gaining on Bush. He has Bush terrified. How can you tell? You can tell because George W. Bush got so scared he that actually made a POINT! No conservative ever makes a serious point unless he is in a state of panic.

In the last presidential debate between Republican candidates for the nomination, McCain asked Bush why he opposed campaign finance reform. Bush said he did not oppose it, he opposed the fake McCain-Finegold "reform" bill. Then, in last-ditch desperation, he went further. He actually asked McCain why, if it was such a fair bill, all the Republicans opposed it and all the Democrats supported it!

Now, from the get-go on this bill, conservatives opposed it and the liberal media went wild about it. Republicans opposed it and Democrats supported it. But no conservative ever asked McCain why. For month after month after month after month, no conservative has put this question to McCain.

The reason Republicans oppose it is that the McCain-Finegold "reform" only cuts off Republican sources of support. It leaves the unions free to use the dues their members have to pay to support Democrats. This is solid, understandable, believable point everybody would understand if Republicans ever brought it up. So they don't bring it up.

You see, to ask such a question would violate the fundamental rule of conservatism: never, never make a point that threatens to expose your opponents' weaknesses. Conservatives never ask, for example, why liberal programs never WORK.

In arguing with liberals, each group has an invariable, mindless routine. If you are a moderate, you offer to compromise. If you are a respectable conservative, you apologize. If you are a hard line conservative, you say something ridiculous. In other words, each group has its own means of letting liberals - and their fellow travelers like McCain -- off the hook. They let them off the hook by focusing attention away from the simple fact that leftism is SILLY.

As in Bush's case, only pure desperation will force a conservative to get to the point.

 

AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY IS RACIST, BUT NO ONE DARES SAY WHAT KIND OF RACISM IT IS

 

Being black and ignored by the media, Alan Keyes is the only Republican candidate who dares say anything. In the morass of tongue-tied, silly conservatives, he is a major relief. When he appeared on Crossfire, he was a welcome relief from the usual format of conservative mindlessness and gutlessness.

When Bill Press, of whom all conservatives are terrified, jumped on Keyes about opposing military action in Kosovo, Keyes hopped right back at him. Conservatives NEVER talk back to liberals. So when a conservative actually gets tough with a liberal, the liberal acts like he has been bitten by a bunny rabbit. The shock is immense. Press backed down immediately.

Keyes played the race card. He pointed out that the United States took action in Kosovo on rumors of tens of thousands of deaths. Meanwhile a hundred thousand people die every year in the Sudanese crisis, but there is no question of the US taking action there. And he pointed out that there had been a deliberate distortion to get the Kosovo numbers as high as they were reputed to be.

It was wonderful to see a conservative on Crossfire pretending to be a man for a change. Keyes said the decision to go into Kosovo rather than Sudan "wasn't really racial," so he wouldn't sound like Jesse Jackson. But he didn't specify anything else it might be. Actually, the decision was very racial indeed, but not for the reason that Keyes implies. American policy in Kosovo has nothing to do with humanitarianism or the fact that people are being butchered. As General Wesley Clark made very, very clear, the purpose of American policy in Europe is to enforce multiculturalism (See June 12, 1999 article, "Busing By Bomber"). American killing in Europe is an exact parallel to using troops in American to enforce integration and calling out the National Guard in Boston to enforce busing.

It is true that American policy is racist, and that racism is the reason the United States bombed and killed Serb civilians but never even considered action in the Sudan. The fact is that there is a racial policy, but this racial policy is only aimed at one race.

The United States is not interested in bringing non-blacks into Africa, or in enforcing any kind of multiethnic policy on that continent. Likewise, the United States demands open borders for immigration into Europe and the breaking down of European cultures by forcing every country to be multicultural. We are willing to kill to break down European cultures, and we have said so.

Since Wesley Clark wore a uniform when he announced this policy of killing to enforce a multiethnic society on every European country, no conservative is going to object. Clark specifically declared this policy is aimed at EUROPE. The United States has no interest in bringing immigrants into Japan or China, or in requiring those countries to become multiethnic. Henry Ford once said that "You can buy a Ford in any color, provided it is black." The United States has declared that it is dedicated to killing to enforce a multiethnic policy on countries of every color, so long as they are white.

So Keyes is perfectly correct. America's "multiethnic" policy is indeed racist. But this is not because the United States Government likes the white race or any of the many white cultures. On the contrary, American policy is to enforce the final solution to whitey and each of his various cultures.

So, are any conservatives going to denounce this program of both cultural and ethnic genocide as racist? No. They will denounce this CRITICISM of cultural and ethnic genocide as racist.





   MENU
Home
Bob's Blog
Current Articles
Article Archive
Whitaker's World View
World View Archives
About Bob Whitaker
Contact Bob
Links
Privacy Policy
   WEEKLY EMAILS
DON'T you miss 'em! What could he say next?   Plenty.

E-Mail:
 Subscribe
 Unsubscribe


Bob's first book - 1976 A Plague On Both Your Houses
A PLAGUE ON BOTH YOUR HOUSES



Bob's second book - 1982 The New Right Papers
The New Right Papers



Bob's deadliest book - 2004 Why Johnny Can't Think: America's Professor-Priesthood
Why Johnny Can't Think
America's
Professor-Priesthood


© Copyright 2001. All rights reserved.