There is an interesting advertisement
on page C-11 of the July 13, 1999 "New York
Times." It shows a happy, nice looking young
white couple. The header says, "WE WANT YOU
TO MEET THE RIGHT WOMAN AS MUCH AS YOU DO."
Below this, the lead sentence is, "Our goal
is Jewish continuity."
At the end the article announces that this is part
of , "A Not-For-Profit Program of the Jewish
Board of Family and Children's Services. A Recipient
Agency of UJA-Federation."
The UJA, the United Jewish Appeal, is a tax-deductible
In a sane world, there would be nothing strange
about this advertisement. In a sane world, it is
routine for people to be concerned about the survival
of their own kind. After all, as Benjamin Franklin
pointed out, there is nothing more natural than
for a person to want to see people who look like
he does survive and multiply.(See "Benjamin
Franklin Was Anaziwhowantedtokillsixmillionjews!!",
But one wonders what would happen to a tax-deductible
group that sponsored "white continuity."
It is true that no white man ever
made an African a slave. Every single black man
sold to whites in Africa was already a slave. Whites
bought them from blacks. It is true that no one
cares about the blacks who sold blacks. There is
no guilt there, and for an excellent reason.
It is true that for every Jew killed by Hitler during
World War II, Stalin killed several Russian peasants
IN PEACETIME. But the Russians who helped slaughter
Russian workers by the tens of millions live on
pensions today, while Nazis are hunted down. There
is no guilt whatsoever connected with Communist
oppression, and for a very good reason.
It is true that the ancestors of today's American
Indians drove earlier American Indians off their
land. Indians moving into America across the land
bridge from Asia came down and drove earlier settlers
of North America before them. Later waves drove
these immigrants south in turn, and they pushed
the earlier inhabitants steadily southward. Wave
after wave of Indians were driven into the Central
American jungles, into the high Andes, into the
frozen hell of Tierra del Fuego.
But only when the white man came and drove the latest
wave of Indians off of THEIR land did it become
a Great Crime. Only whites have ever been found
guilty of driving anybody off their land. Driving
others off of land you need is part of history.
So whites alone are held to be GUILTY of it, and
for a very good reason.
We all know what The Very Good Reason is. Blacks
in Africa, descendants of those who sold slaves
to whites, have no money. There is no money in holding
African blacks responsible for their ancestors'
enslavement of today's American blacks. But there
is plenty of money in WHITE guilt.
Russia is absolutely, stony broke. There is not
a dime to be made out of Russian Communist guilt
over killing tens of millions of peasants and workers.
There is no money in dead Russian peasants.
Germany is very, very rich. There are many billions
of dollars to be made from German guilt.
And Western white gentiles in general hunger for
guilt the way a baby hungers for its mother's milk.
The charge of being naziswhowanttokillsixmillionjews
has opened the pocketbooks of American taxpayers
for any scheme liberals can dream up. Guilt has
provided an ocean of wealth that still streams into
Russian peasants were more numerous, but they are
not considered human, because there's no money in
The Indians who drove earlier Indians out of America
are collecting endless tributes from whites. Hundreds
of sobbing movies have been made about how the Evil
White Man drove the Noble and Loving Native American
off of the land which, we insist, was always his.
The unique right to have casinos on Indian land
is but the latest installment of this unending guilt
Why doesn't anyone mention the descendants of the
Indians OUR Indians drove south? Down in Tierra
del Fuego are the descendants of Indians who were
driven out of America millennia before the white
man got here. They are cold, they are hungry, and
they are forgotten. Why does no one ask today's
American Indians about them?
Because if you brought that up to today's Indian,
he would laugh in your face. Why should he feel
guilty for taking land from people who were already
here? It is what all men have always done, and to
feel guilty about it would be ridiculous. White
Christians, with their perversion of Christianity,
love guilt. They absolutely wallow in it. So, say
the Indians, the blacks, and all the rest, let them
wallow. Let them pay and pay and pay and pay.
Another American perversion of Christianity says
this: our ancestors came to America, so we must
let anybody from anywhere settle here. You see,
"America is a nation of immigrants." There's
money in that phrase. Immigrants mean 1) cheaper
labor for big business and 2) votes for liberals.
So liberals back it all the way, and "Christian"
conservatives squeeze every dime out of it they
All in the name of Universal Love, of course. What's
a little blasphemy if the price is right?
Anyone who actually knows any history knows that
every country on earth is a nation of immigrants.
All nations were created by immigration, and all
nations are eventually destroyed by immigration.
Working together, liberals and "Christian"
conservatives have turned our Christian tradition
into nothing more than a giant, growing cancer of
pure guilt. It pays for every non-white group to
push some guilt for their purposes. It is destroying
Blacks glory in their blackness, at least publicly.
Jews have nothing but good things to say about the
Jewish people and the Jewish tradition. For white
gentiles, the one great virtue is self-hatred. "Christian"
conservatives consider it evil to be concerned about
the fact that the white race is being crowded out
of existence. Both immigration and integration are
DEMANDED in ALL white majority countries. Further,
immigration and integration are demanded ONLY in
white majority countries.
Jamaica or Japan can take in immigrants if they
want to, but if they cut off immigration tomorrow,
no one would object. But if Australia or France
cut off immigration, "Christian" conservatives
will join with liberals in screaming bloody murder.
"Christian" conservatives are now taking
the lead in pushing international interracial adoptions
in areas where immigration is not doing the job
In the long run, I believe the "Christian"
conservatives will be proud to say that they did
more to do away with the white race than liberals
did. After all, they start with the advantage of
being trusted by conservative whites, which liberals
do not have. For "Christian" conservatives,
this trust is money in the bank.
Meanwhile, black churches and synagogues are openly
and uncompromisingly in favor of the well being
and continuity their own people.
After all, what kind of sicko wouldn't be?
*The payoff is not always in money.
When Ralph Reed stabbed Pat Buchanan in the back
for George Bush, he was after power, not money.
Another payoff might be the one many a "Christian"
conservative would sell his mother for: liberals
won't call him a "racist" or "anaziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews."