The United States has a racial policy
in force. It is a policy that is aimed at a final
solution to what is referred to as "the RACIAL
problem."
Everybody knows that the word "race" here
actually means "white," though I am the
only person who EVER points that out.
This so-called solution to something called a "race"
problem involves something called "multiracialism."
But this so-called multiracialism is aimed only
at WHITE majority countries. It is aimed at Australia,
New Zealand, Europe, the United States, and Canada
-oh, and Iceland, too.
It is aimed ONLY at white majority countries.
It is aimed at ALL white majority counties.
White majority countries constitute what is called
"the race problem." Solving the "race"
problem is a euphemism for solving the WHITE problem.
As one New Left leader put it in a burst of honesty
in the 1960s: "The white race is the cancer
of history." For once, the Love Generation
spoke plain English.
If all efforts at promoting the immigration of other
races and integrating them were ONLY aimed at Africa,
white liberals and respectable conservatives would
scream bloody murder.
Likewise with Asia.
Any liberal and any Jack Kemp or George Bush, upon
hearing about a large white population anywhere,
is going to ask what they are doing about becoming
multiracial.
Respectable conservatives and liberals agree that
the white problem must be solved.
As long as I am the only person pointing this out,
I think we can stop pounding our chests and talking
about how we brave souls are going to found and
maintain a nation.
|
Virgil Huston is the person who made
this column possible. It was his idea for me to
do it, and he is the one who puts these pages on
the Net. Naturally, I want to use this column to
give him some hell.
Each week Virgil sends an email letter to League
members. Last week his letter came out the same
day as the Clinton acquittal and Virgil was outraged
that such blatant lying had not been punished.
Virgil wants us to send outraged letters to Senator
Hollings.
I was jealous. I wish I could still get that upset
about any extreme of dishonesty in American politics.
But I have become accustomed to the fact that there
is no honesty in American politics, right or left.
In American politics, everybody not only says things
that are untrue; everybody always says things BECAUSE
they are not true.
"Spin" is everything today, on both the
left and the right. Nobody tells the truth. There
is no morality at all in our politics, and nobody
expects any. There is open amorality on the part
of Clinton defenders. But there is blasphemy on
the part of our rightist psychopaths who say they
speak for God.
For the past year, the American people have said
they want a psychopath named Clinton running things
for them. The right wants its own psychopaths in
charge, the ones who shout "GOD!" a lot.
What is a psychopath? He is a person without a conscience.
But he can sure act like he has one. In the course
of living his life, the psychopath learns to fake
a conscience. A good psychopath is much better at
acting as if he feels guilty than anyone who has
a real sense of guilt does.
Did you see Jimmy Swaggart's crying guilt act after
HE got caught?
Marvelous!
We don't want any honest people in public life.
We only want people who say the right thing at the
right time. We also want people who do not have
any secret prejudices.
A good psychopath tells you just what you want to
hear, just when you want to hear it. A psychopath
has no secret prejudices. He has NO genuine attachments.
A psychopath is the perfect leader for our age,
a man with no prejudices whatsoever.
He has none of the underlying beliefs that might
be exposed. He has no feeling for his race. He is
no provincial, and he will sign any plank you want
in your platform without a quiver. The psychopath
is exactly what you want him to be.
When dealing with Clinton, I was in exactly the
same position I am in when I am dealing with drugs
or abortion. Rightists are demanding that I take
their position, all the way. They demand I BELIEVE,
or at least act like I BELIEVE, that they represent
morality.
The right believes it has morality because its leaders
keep yelling God. Nobody outside the right thinks
we have any morality. We sold out our morality with
our prejudices and our personal beliefs. That's
the right "spin." Having no prejudices
buys you Respectability. We disavowed our prejudices
so we could have leaders who claim to represent
True Religion.
We have leaders who claim to speak for God, but
the problem is that no one outside the right is
going to listen to these blasphemous kookoos. They
are not only dishonest like Clinton, they are DUMB,
which he isn't.
Dumb Bob Livingston was a good example. He kept
saying that his demands against Clinton had nothing
to do with Clinton's sex life. So when they found
some problems with Livingston's sex life, he resigned
and said Clinton should resign, which meant that
Livingston's demand for Clinton's resignation WAS
based on Clinton's sexual doings. These kookoos
simply have no idea what they are saying from day
to day. Only the right takes them seriously, which
is why the right will go under with them.
The psychopaths who rule the right are not only
dumb, they have no interest whatever in long term
strategy. We need people to go after the left, but
the professional rightist's only interest is in
keeping his respectability.
The biggest thing that happened in the Clinton debacle
was the total discrediting of the so-called "Women's
Movement," but no conservative anywhere - but
me - is going to mention the hypocrisy of the women's
movement in the near future. In a year or two, everybody
will have forgotten it and "women's leaders'
will be back on the talk shows, so respectable conservatives
can go back to respectfully disagreeing with them.
What about some letters to newspapers reminding
people of the hypocrisy of the women's movement?
Don't hold your breath.
When liberals get a right-wing group into the position
that the "Women's Movement" has put itself
into, the left goes ahead and DESTROYS it. And the
first group that joins the liberals in damning those
groups are the respectable conservatives. (Please
see September 26 article, "Respectable
Conservatives kill Their Wounded" and October
3, "Respectable Conservatives,
They're Just Bureaucrats")
So we can yell about the unrighteousness of it all,
or we can try to begin getting serious. We can cry
and moan about dishonesty, or we can devote a little
effort to BEING a little honest for a change. This
is what I am trying to do here.
I disagree with Virgil.** He wants
you to spend time protesting to our lame duck junior
senator. I think there are about a thousand things
that are more important than that to be done. And
if we are ever going to get any morality in this
country, we'd damned well better get our priorities
straight.
I was asked to be specific here. To start with,
if I were a betting man, I would bet that: 1) there
will be a minimum of three thousand letters send
to Hollings protesting his vote and 2) there has
not been and will not be ONE SINGLE letter sent
to the State paper protesting their total censorship
policy on the antimiscegenation provision. (See
January 2 article, "Censorship
Pays")
The State's email address is stateeditor@thestate.com
The State's postal address is
The State Newspaper
PO Box 1333
Columbia, SC 29202
Another hundred letters to Hollings will mean nothing.
A few letters to the State would mean a lot. Both
the impeachment and the antimiscegenation provisions
are done deals, but in the latter case protest would
matter in the long run. So, like good right wingers,
we join in the protest that doesn't matter.
Why? Because everybody's doing it, that's why.
There is nothing that is more a complete waste of
time than trying to save the soul of a lame-duck
liberal senator. What it does accomplish is this:
It reassures respectable conservatives that we may
talk about not supporting them blindly, but when
push comes to shove, all our real efforts will go
into standard conservative stuff.
I go on and on here about the failures of respectable
conservatives. How many of us actually write respectable
conservatives about these failures? I would hazard
that no such letters are written.
Not surprisingly, my suggestions have to do with
backing MY efforts.
Why?
Obviously it is because I take what I do seriously,
or I wouldn't do it. I feel that Southern nationalists
in general, and I in particular, are fighting a
lonely battle here, and it makes me angry when one
of us demands that we all get busy backing - ho,
hum -- standard conservatism.
**One South Carolinian disagrees
with another. How unusual!
|