Bob Whitaker's Weekly Articles  –  October 24, 1998


October 24, 1998  –  Poisoned Fruit

October 24, 1998  –  Liberal Spores

 

Poisoned Fruit

 

It is established law in this country that, if a man tortures and kills children, he is set free if any of the evidence that convicts him is collected in violation of any rules set up by a judge. So if he is searched incorrectly, or Miranda rights are not read, the policeman who did it wrong suffers no penalty, and the criminal is set free.

All evidence collected as a result of a violation of judicial rules is called "poisoned fruit." So, if an informant's name is found before Miranda rights are read, and that informant leads the police to the children's bodies and other evidence, that evidence is not admissible.

Liberals go all the way for their clients.

A few thousand kids may get molested and a few hundred killed, but that's the price you have to pay if liberal lawyers are to have their form of justice. All liberals agree that it's a bit tough on the kids, but justice is not perfect.

Unless, of course, that injustice comes from a nonliberal source. Liberals oppose the death penalty, so the possibility of one innocent person being executed worries them to death.

So liberals talk endlessly about the possibility that the death penalty may be imposed on an innocent person. They never spend one second worrying about the innocent children their policies kill.

So, when debating the death penalty, no respectable conservative ever brings up the innocent children liberals kill with their policies. By the same token, no Southern Crawler ever brings it up. You become a good respectable conservative and a respectable Southerner - a Southern Crawler - by following liberal rules.

If you are to be a good Southern Crawler, you never question the "poisoned fruit" of integration laws. The Fourteenth Amendment was adopted unconstitutionally, and the Federal court decisions outlawing antimiscegenation laws in the 1960's absolutely reject all traces of constitutional intent. The states which adopted the Bill of Rights and the Fourteenth Amendment had and enforced antimsicegenation laws. Not even the carpetbagger administrations in the South objected to them.

But the courts decided all that didn't matter. The courts didn't want miscegenation laws, so out they went. Naturally, no respectable conservative and not one Southern Creep objected to this.

Years later, in the 1970's, the Federal courts decided they didn't want states to have restrictions on abortion, either. So they declared the constitution did not allow states to have restrictions on abortion. Every Catholic bishop had cheered the court decision doing away with antimiscegenation laws. But when the court did exactly the same thing to antiabortion laws, the bishops started shouting about "original intent." Since bishops had objected, respectable conservatives felt they could object. Since Northern conservatives had objected, Southern Crawlers decided they could object to the abortion decision, too.

But all this fake courage came far too late.

Because respectable conservatives and Southern Creeps only objected when fashionable opinion allowed them to, unborn children got murdered, and other children get murdered and molested every day.

People who only object when fashionable opinion allows them to are going to betray you every single time when it counts. If you select Southern Creeps and respectable conservatives as your leaders, you get precisely what you deserve.

 

Liberal Spores

 

We have to get out of the Union, because the only discussion inside the Union is between liberals and their pets, the respectable conservatives. In the present so-called discussion, the right can only delay the inevitable expansion of leftist authority.

As recent incidents are demonstrating once again, leftism will not stop until its power is absolute. Respectable conservatives and Southern Crawlers provide a false and temporary illusion of opposition.

Many infections use spores to preserve themselves. A disease germ infests an area, but then the area dries out, so the disease germs form individual, hard shells, and wait for the rain to come back. In the meantime, it looks like the disease has been beaten.

Leftism uses the same method.

Southern Crawlers insist that, now that the libs have won on all the old civil rights fronts, they will quit. How happy we all are now, with JUST ENOUGH anti-white laws. So, by giving liberals those laws, we have inoculated ourselves against any further outbreaks of this disease. We need no longer worry about limitless Federal expansion in the name of civil rights, right?

Wrong. The disease did not go into remission. Like all liberal programs short of total bureaucratic control of everything, it merely spored.

But the spores are always just waiting for their water. And for Federal power extension in the name of diversity, the "water" is a hate crime. Give them one hate crime, and the disease is back in action.

Now a homosexual got murdered, and, surprise, surprise, liberals want more Federal "Hate" laws In the name of the melting pot, we need another extension of Federal authority.

Crawly Southerners (I call them Southern Creeps) agree with liberals that they were wrong to object to such extension last time.

But the respectable conservatives and Southern Creeps say , "THIS time, you really are going too far." Quite reasonably, liberals say, "Just let us enforce it a few years and you'll LOVE it, just like you did everything else we enforced."

Experience everywhere shows us that leftists often look like they've been tamed for the moment. But in the long run, they never stop demanding more. And conservatives never stop giving them more.

Back in 1959, when I first went to England, Hyde Park in London was the world center of free speech. It was a point of pride with Britons: in Hyde Park you could say dirty words or defend dope addiction or anything else. It was a tourist draw because it was unique it the world.

Then, in the 1960s, Britain passed laws against any bad remarks about any minority group. This was a Labour Party move, and bothered a lot of people. But then something happened that made the left look like it had been tamed: a person who was convicted under the law proved that every remark he had made was a simple recitation of statistics. The judge acquitted him with a historic remark:

"You cannot imprison an Englishman for telling the truth."

All the world thought freedom of speech was saved in Britain!

It wasn't.

The left was tamed for the moment, but the left always gets what it wants in the long run. It is essential to the left that all dialogue abut minorities be subject to law.

In 1986, the British courts gave the leftists all they wanted. Even the blasé British were shocked. In Crown vs. Joseph Pierce, 1986, the judge gave Pierce a year for inciting racial hatred, and the judge said:

"The truth is no defense."

By the way, in 1986 the United Kingdom was under respectable conservative rule.

As usual, the left seemed to be under control, but, with the connivance of respectable conservatives, it has resumed its march toward absolute control over free speech in Britain.

We all know there is now a major offensive to expand Federal authority under new "Hate" laws.

Meanwhile the left is opening up this offensive on new fronts. There is a new cable movie starring Beau Bridges. It is called "Defending the First." The movie argues that anyone who publicly disagrees with the liberal line on race is criminally responsible for hate crimes.

But this incitement is only to be blamed on the political right. Leftists can incite all the hate crimes they want to. A year or two ago, a black man got on a subway in New York City and started shooting white people. He said he hated whites.

A couple of years ago, the New York State School Board actually approved a textbook which stated flatly that all white people were racists! It was pulled at the very last minute.

So, who got blamed for the black man's murder of a lot of white people? New Yorkers unanimously blamed the gun for it! A wife of one of the victims got elected to congress saying it was the gun's fault!

Did you hear any respectable conservative blaming any of this on leftists?

Me neither.

How about Southerner Crawlers?

Me neither.

The bottom line is this: in politics, you are either going forward or you are going back. We must either destroy the left and discredit it, or it will consume us. Respectable conservatives and Southern Creeps say that liberalism so far is not just OK, it is great.

We must either discredit liberalism totally, or we must secede.

We must stop trying to get liberals to approve of us and turn to driving them out. If the Union continues, if leftist respectability continues, your future belongs to the left.





   MENU
Home
Bob's Blog
Current Articles
Article Archive
Whitaker's World View
World View Archives
About Bob Whitaker
Contact Bob
Links
Privacy Policy
   WEEKLY EMAILS
DON'T you miss 'em! What could he say next?   Plenty.

E-Mail:
 Subscribe
 Unsubscribe


Bob's first book - 1976 A Plague On Both Your Houses
A PLAGUE ON BOTH YOUR HOUSES



Bob's second book - 1982 The New Right Papers
The New Right Papers



Bob's deadliest book - 2004 Why Johnny Can't Think: America's Professor-Priesthood
Why Johnny Can't Think
America's
Professor-Priesthood



© Copyright 2001. All rights reserved. Contact: bob@whitakeronline.org