|
|
| |
|
Truths that Work |
A long time I ago, by trial and error, I found the
perfect answer to use on a Yankee who badmouths the
South.
No matter what he says, my first reply is:
"You know, we didn't fight a war to keep YOU."
If you say that and stop right there, it leaves them
furious and frustrated. Anything they say is going to
be on the defensive.
The greatest war in American history, the war in which
more Americans were killed by far than in all
America's other wars combined, was for the express
purpose of keeping the South IN the union.
All we wanted was to get away from Yankees.
|
Chasing down Southern Whites, Phase II
|
It's been called the Civil War, the War of the
Rebellion and the War of Northern Aggression. The
War to Keep the South covers all these names, and is
the accurate one.
This title, The War to Keep the South, makes the
perfect connection between that struggle and the (more
recent) civil rights struggle for integration:
In both cases the main purpose of America was to keep
Southerners from being left alone.
When I was coming up, the idea that blacks had a right
to my company seemed absurd. Once again, they didn't
want rights. They wanted US.
All the magazines are full of the black girl who is
Bond's girl in the new film. She is on the cover of
Jet Magazine with the Irishman playing Bond. That
makes me nostalgic. In the 1950s, every single issue
of Jet Magazine had a mixed couple on the cover.
Mixed couples were the only dream of black people in
the 1950s. The argument for integration was the
exact opposite of today's Holy Diversity. Back then
no one dared use the word "black." They were
"Negroes."
In the 1950s, a "Negro" was a white man in a coat and
tie and a black skin. Every "Negro" on TV or in the
movies had to look exactly like a white man, and they
were usually less than a quarter black.
The original aim of the civil rights movement was that
there be no diversity at all in America. Everyone
would simply be brown. Everybody would have the same
education, the same liberal outlook, and the same low
rate of illegitimate births that whites had then.
This would all be done by forcing Southerners to
integrate with blacks.
|
The Argument for Integration Changes
|
In the 1950s, the argument for integration was that it
would end diversity. Everybody in every white
majority country would eventually become a uniform
brown. Funny, integration has never been demanded of
any non-white country!
This ideal of ending all diversity in white countries
was preached by Franz Boas as the means of getting rid
of the white race, which he viewed as the common enemy
of Jews and all other minority groups.
To be fair, a few of the most outspoken opponents of
integration were Jews. The founder of US News and
World Report, David Lawrence, demanded the repeal of
the Fourteenth Amendment. In 1961 his
issue commemorating the beginning of the War to keep
the South was the best case ever made for the Southern
Cause.
Right through the 1960s, the NAACP never had a single
black president. They were all leftist Jews.
But by the 1960s, some blacks started to wonder what
BLACKS would get out of all this. Some black leaders
began to realize that "Negroes" was not just a hard
word for Southerners to pronounce, it was also hard
for BLACKS to pronounce. It had never occurred to any
civil rights leaders that blacks had any purpose
except as a battering ram against whites, and no black
appointed as a Leader had questioned that goal.
So in the 1960s the old goal of getting rid of whitey
was not enough. The argument for integration changed.
Integration became "de-segregation". This
"de-segregation" was now "to get equal schools for
blacks." You bused white children to black schools,
said liberals, so that whites would be forced to give
black schools equal funding.
|
|
Black Schools could have been Equal
|
|
Before 1954, on average black teachers in North
Carolina were already paid more than white teachers.
This was to avoid integration.
Governor Byrnes of South Carolina introduced the
state's sales tax to provide equal funding to black
schools. If blacks had been willing to trade
integration for funding they could have had all the
money they wanted for their schools.
For integration, blacks threw away their opportunity
for huge funding for their schools. No one
questioned the fact that the function of blacks was
to act as a sledgehammer to break up white society.
So for liberals to say that they wanted busing just
to get funding for black schools was nonsense. Yet
by then,, no conservative would dare point this
out.
But the bottom line on integration was the same as
the bottom line on the War to Keep the South. White
Southerners wanted to be left alone.
If we stick to that goal, we can win.
Please see
November 9, 2002 From that: “HOW TO WIN” and
also “DO WE GET THE MINORITY VOTES WE WILL NEED MORE
AND MORE IN THE FUTURE?”
|
|
| |
Is it Possible for some Minorities to have some real
Pride?
|
| |
The rise of black militants in the late 1960s changed more
than the word "Negro." It also exposed how humiliating
the whole liberal approach to integration had been. Please
see
February 9, 2002 - WHITE ANTIRACISM IS REALLY VERY
RACIST.
Militants pointed out that "Negro" just meant a dark white
man and blacks only goal was to mix with whites. It has
always been true that leftists look upon blacks as more
sub-human than Klansmen do, but Stokeley Carmichael and
other militant blacks shouted that out for the world to
hear.
By the 1960s, when Susan Sontag declared the open and
honest liberal position that "the white race is the cancer
of history," the blacks she depended on to get rid of
whites were showing signs of having some purposes of their
own.
The “Abolish Whites” Movement was being threatened by
Black Pride.
|
|
The Argument for Integration
Changes, Phase III |
| |
White integrationists still regard blacks as a
sledgehammer with which they
can break up white society and get rid of whites.
Integration is NOT
"race-mixing." Its NOT "mixing the races." Integration
is only demanded in white majority countries.
Integration has nothing to do with "the races". It is
ONLY intended to be used as a sledgehammer against the
white race.
But regarding blacks as nothing but a sledgehammer against
white society is insulting to blacks, so whites have not
been able to say that since the 1960s.
So now integration is not AGAINST whites. It's FOR
whites. It gives them Diversity. That shows that blacks
educate us just by sitting beside us.
Oh, goody!
Meanwhile, I am still a white Southerner and I want to be
left alone.
We'll pay blacks for the privilege of being left alone,
just as we were willing to fight a war to be left alone.
But not leaving Southerners to themselves seems to be the
only purpose Northern whites and liberal minorities have.
Pathetic, isn't it?
|
| |
Home | Current Articles
| Article Archive
| About Bob Whitaker
| Contact Bob
| Links
| Privacy Policy
|
|
|