ARCHIVE ARTICLES

 

 
HARD TO BELIEVE


A Mexican came to the United States and killed an American law enforcement officer. So we're executing him.

Not only is President Vincente Fox of Mexico not apologizing to the officer's family, he is refusing to meet with President Bush as a protest against the execution.

A French citizen, Moussaoui, was in on the killing of three thousand American citizens. Does France apologize? No way. France is protesting our treatment of him.

Only a country ruled by respectable conservatives could do all the groveling to the Mexicans and the French that we are doing over these incidents.

 

CHILD KIDNAPPINGS


One thing about the rash of child kidnappings and murders needs to be mentioned. In every case, the man accused was in the hands of the authorities and was released. Isn't our System wonderful?

We are being assured by the media that the number of kidnap-murders of this kind has actually gone down in recent years. There seem to be more because recently the media have given such kidnappings enormous coverage.

There is lot of media comment on the fact that these cases have recently received so much attention while child grabs of this kind did not get this kind of media coverage before. The reason is not far to seek.

There used to be no conservative television outlets at all and liberals don't like to talk about real crimes, especially crimes against children.

If you will listen to what liberals say, their official doctrine is that only leftists care about children. Liberal politicians say conservatives are out -- and I am not exaggerating this -- to starve children and ignore anything done to them.

See July 5, 2002 - WERE SOUTH CAROLINIANS STARVING CHILDREN?

If the media had discussed child kidnappings they would have also ended up pointing out that it is the criminals whom liberals acquit or let back out on the street who commit those crimes. It is the law and order conservatives who care about THOSE children.

So child kidnappings were not given much publicity when liberals had a television monopoly.

The media did not talk about specific incidents of crimes against children because each such crime is traceable back to a felon liberals want sympathy for. They only discussed general things like crime RATES and EXPENDITURES on government programs for children.

And, of course, the liberal media demanded more expenditures for the rehabilitation of those nice child molesters.

Besides, any discussion of real crimes opens up a can for worms for the political left.

If liberals talked about specific incidents, they would have to recount cases where people defended their family and property with evil private weapons.

This was not a conspiracy. It was simply that liberal commentators were uncomfortable discussing crime, so they didn't. Now they have to.

Reality is always the leftists' biggest enemy.

 

THE TIME HAS PASSED WHEN LISTENING TO SOCIAL SCIENCE "EXPERTS" WAS AN INNOCENT MISTAKE

Catholic Church authorities have been whining that they are innocent of all those rapes of little boys that priests committed. Their excuse is that back when most of that happened they were just following orders.

The Catholic authorities openly insist that, back when they ignored child molesters, every single social expert from the universities told them that these people could be rehabilitated.

The Church is right about one thing: that rehabilitation line is what every trendy university professor recommended. But then, as now, nothing they say ever WORKS.

If you listen to them, you become a criminal, too. The time when listening to social "experts" was an honest mistake is long, long past.

See July 20, 2002 - IS THERE ANY WAY TO DISCREDIT THOSE WHO ARE ALWAYS WRONG?

No respectable conservative ever points out that the social "experts" are always wrong. And that makes them part of the criminal outlook, too, because tomorrow's crimes will be the result of people listening to those social science professors AGAIN.

YOUR GUN HELPS ME


A relative of mine was very anti-gun. She lives in an upscale area.

Of course it is a very anti-gun community. Wealthy communities in South Carolina tend to associate weapon-owning with the peasants.

I have worked in a prison. Prisoners know areas where there might be guns the way a farmer knows what the weather forecast is. They discuss where the guns are the way a stock trader talks about market trends.

So criminals knew about the lack of guns in my relative's community.

So one night a couple of thugs came right in my relative's front door -- the way they do in gunless Britain. They beat my relative and her husband up and took what they wanted.

She has a gun now.

My relative probably got attacked at least in part because it was well known that her community was gunless. People in that community bragged that they were too classy to have a gun ("like the trailer trash" being the implication).

I want to live in an area that is known less for its trendy attitudes and more for bristling with deadly weapons.

TRENDY OPINION SAYS CRIMINALS ARE BRAVE AND HIGHLY INTELLIGENT


According to established opinion, people should not have guns because the criminals are too brave to be bothered by them. According to anti-gun propaganda, the person with a gun in his home is a terrified wreck but the thug coming into the house and facing the gun is cool, calm, collected and professional.

It used to be the official doctrine of this "criminals are heroes" theory that a person in the home was FORTY-THREE TIMES more likely to have the gun taken away by the cool, heroic, professional criminal than he was to use it to defend himself. They won't even admit they ever said that nonsense now.

But the media said it and the media BELIEVED it. They honestly believe that all Americans are cowards and all criminals are calm and smart, so only a person with a government-issue badge is capable of defending himself with a weapon.

See August 3, 2002 - AMERICA'S PROBLEM IS NOT ****PHYSICAL*** COWARDICE .

 

 

 

Home | Current Articles | Article Archive | About Bob Whitaker | Contact Bob | Links | Privacy Policy

MENU

Home

Current Articles

Article Archive

Whitaker's World View

World View Archives

About Bob Whitaker

Contact Bob

Links

Privacy Policy


Current Issue
Issue: Aug. 17, 2002
Editor: Virgil H. Huston, Jr.
© 2001 WhitakerOnLine.org


Email List
Sign up for our email list to be notified of site updates:
E-Mail:

© Copyright 2001, 2002. All rights reserved. Contact: bob@whitakeronline.org