ARCHIVE ARTICLES

 

 
SUPREME COURT SAYS THAT IQ IS A LIFE AND DEATH MATTER


The Supreme Court has ruled that no retarded person may be executed.

The term "retarded" has only one definition:

A person who is "retarded" has an Intelligence Quotient (IQ) below 70.

Until this decision, liberals insisted that tested IQ meant nothing. This is because, as "The Bell Curve" points out, black IQ is far below white IQ, and this difference is INBORN. So anybody who believes in IQ has, for two generations, been officially labeled anaziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.

But now IQ is being used for a purpose which is favored by the political LEFT: the end of capital punishment. Suddenly the only people who would dare discount IQ tests would be naziswhowanttokillsixmillionjews. After all, HITLER was for capital punishment.

 

DOES IT MATTER IF SOMEONE IS ANTI-WHITE IF THEY AREN'T ANTI-SEMITIC?


Well, it turns out that Arabic terrorists are bad because "They're anti-American and anti-Semitic." Farrakhan and other black separatists were denounced because they were "anti-white and anti-Semitic."

I cannot remember ever hearing anyone denounced for being anti-American or anti-white unless they were also anti-Semitic.

With one exception: For months after the September 11 attack, over two-thirds of the public connected that attack with American support for Israel. So every single commentator assured us that the attack had absolutely nothing to do with Israel (April 6, 2002 - REMEMBER WHEN ISRAEL HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH AMERICA'S MIDDLE EAST PROBLEMS?).

That was the only time I ever saw "anti-American" denounced when it wasn't combined with "and anti-Semitic."

But the establishment line, the line which liberals and respectable conservatives and ALL media commentators follow, is that there is nothing wrong with being anti-white or anti-American as long as you are not against any official minority group.

After all, ALL respectable commentators, right or left, are routinely both anti-American and anti-white.

ALL respectable commentators demand that every white majority, and ONLY white majority countries, be open to third world immigration and to internal integration. This is what "anti-racism" actually means. It never applies to non-white countries. "Anti-racism" is a code word for getting rid of whites.

By the same token, McCain says flatly and all respectable conservatives say implicitly that all minorities should demand open borders for America and that their loyalty should be to other minorities, not to Americans July 14, 2001 - THE FOUNDING FATHERS' PATRIOTISM IS MCAIN'S TREASON).

So you simply do not hear anyone denouncing someone for simply being anti-white or anti-American. They have to be anti-white AND anti-semitic or anti-American AND anti-Semitic.

 

 
UNPREJUDICED PEOPLE
 


In the 1950s and 1960s, every "progressive" Southerner worshipped New York City.

As usual, I could see back then what was coming, and as always I regarded these Southern liberals with absolute puzzlement. I could not imagine how grownups who could read could possibly be such obvious fools. I saw that New York was about to come apart, yet Southern turncoats regarded them with an open-mouthed, drooling adoration.

In the 1960s, when a girl was slowly stabbed to death in New York while hundreds of New Yorkers stayed in their apartments and didn't even call the police, this astonished all the New York worshippers.

What amazed me was why this incident should have surprised anybody.

New Yorkers were unprejudiced people. Unprejudiced people don't like to get involved.

As unprejudiced people, New Yorkers only got excited abut issues liberals allowed them to get excited about. They have learned not to be concerned about anything liberals do not get excited about. It may bother you to see a mixed couple, but you have been trained that you have no right to an opinion on that.

So you don't get involved. This would strike earlier Americans as odd, but they were a bunch of bigots anyway.

Another place which was admired by liberals in the 1960s was the unprejudiced, brown land called Brazil. I knew that Brazil was a smelly hole where dogs and abandoned children roamed the streets starving. But in the 1950s, liberals worshipped the place becuse there was no racial prejudice there.

Even as a child I could not imagine how any literate adult could regard BRAZIL with the drooling adoration every Southern turncoat expressed as loudly as possible.

Brazilians are unprejudiced people. They don't want to get involved.

Look at the Catholic bishops. For decades, they never gave a damn about raped little boys. But they were out there fighting for racial busing and against capital punishment. They were concerned about what they were told to be concerned with, and they were otherwise perfect sociopaths. That's how they got to be bishops.

You can't become a general or a politician or a bishop of any church today if you are not a sociopath. You can't have the gut feelings your masters denounce, and to have no gut feelings except the ones you are allowed requires a sociopath.

Once you allow someone to tell you which of your feelings is a prejudice and which is a preference, you make that someone your master.

 

 

Home | Current Articles | Article Archive | About Bob Whitaker | Contact Bob | Links | Privacy Policy

MENU

Home

Current Articles

Article Archive

Whitaker's World View

World View Archives

About Bob Whitaker

Contact Bob

Links

Privacy Policy


Current Issue
Issue: June 22, 2002
Editor: Virgil H. Huston, Jr.
© 2001 WhitakerOnLine.org


Email List
Sign up for our email list to be notified of site updates:
E-Mail:

© Copyright 2001, 2002. All rights reserved. Contact: bob@whitakeronline.org